InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now. Learn more â
Standard Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to standard
-
-
InfluxDB
InfluxDB â Built for High-Performance Time Series Workloads. InfluxDB 3 OSS is now GA. Transform, enrich, and act on time series data directly in the database. Automate critical tasks and eliminate the need to move data externally. Download now.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
-
-
-
-
SimpleCov
Code coverage for Ruby with a powerful configuration library and automatic merging of coverage across test suites
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
u-service
Represent use cases in a simple and powerful way while writing modular, expressive and sequentially logical code.
-
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
standard discussion
standard reviews and mentions
- Rubocop-obsession: RuboCop extension focused on higher-level concepts
-
Five Things to Avoid in Ruby
There are two parts to Rubocop, one of which is good. The good part is the engine. The not so good part is the defaults, many of which are wrong and many more of which are "not even wrong" (which is to say that they are enforcing a particularly unidiomatic way of shaping the code based on unimaginative ideas of what good code is supposed to look like).
If you want to eliminate most discussions about code formatting and have a useful subset, use standardrb[1]. I disagree with about a third of its recommendations, but I stopped configuring with standard, whereas I had an override list at least thirty rules long (that had to be updated periodically because of incessant patch version renaming of rules) with vanilla Rubocop.
Rubocop's engine is good. Rubocop's default rules are best avoided and replaced entirely with standard, because they are at least mostly sensible and still allow for "style".
[1] https://github.com/standardrb/standard
-
Am I the only one who doesn't put parentheses around the parameters in Ruby method definitions?
Rubocop has a default rule that says to put parentheses when there are parameters; even Standardrb has a default ([https://github.com/standardrb/standard/blob/8307fa8f449f896075ccad 74bf6a128ed2c26189/config/base.yml#L1098:title])
- Standardrb: Ruby's bikeshed-proof linter and formatter
-
Must-have gems for mature Rails
gem "rubocop" - https://github.com/rubocop/rubocop | Set up code guidelines for your dev team, I recommend using whatever Standard recommends.
-
A Writer's Ruby
Cynically, reading heavily between the lines, this reads to me like DHH just found out lots of rubyists like standardrb. https://github.com/standardrb/standard -- and this is his quick reaction to it.
-
"Useless Ruby sugar": Endless (one-line) methods
This is a huge reason why I still use StandardJS andâshifting back to Rubyâwhy I rejected the countless requests for implementing line-length or any other metrics analysis rules for [StandardRB](https://github.com/standardrb/standard). There is always a legitimate edge case when it comes to length of lines and functions and the alternativeâchopping them off arbitrarilyâis rarely an improvement.
-
An Introduction to RuboCop for Ruby on Rails
This approach is known as Standard Ruby. It can also be completed with plugins, including one for Ruby on Rails projects.
-
It's Official: the Standard Ruby VS Code extension
Oh, this is fantastic! Would you be willing to send a quick PR to our README?
-
Rails vs Rubocop?
[0] https://github.com/testdouble/standard
-
A note from our sponsor - InfluxDB
www.influxdata.com | 21 May 2025
Stats
standardrb/standard is an open source project licensed under GNU General Public License v3.0 or later which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of standard is Ruby.