sqlglot VS polars

This is probably referring to "zero changes to your driver code" and not "zero changes to the SQL you send over this driver".

Translating between SQL dialects is notoriously hard and attempts to translate [1] are working in 95% of cases. But the last 5% would require 5x amount of work. That's because "SQL dialect" also includes weird edge cases of type inference of things like COALESCE(5, FALSE) and emulation of system catalogs (pg_catalog, information_schema).

[1] https://github.com/tobymao/sqlglot

Recommend checking out https://github.com/tobymao/sqlglot if you are interested in this capability for other SQL dialects

Tools like this are helpful for:

- Rendering SQL in a consistent way, eg for snapshot testing

sqlglot – Python SQL Parser and Transpiler

In the project we used Python lib networkx and a DiGraph object (Direct Graph). To detect a table reference in a Query, we use sqlglot, a SQL parser (among other things) that works well with Bigquery.

Cool! Is this built with sqlglot[1] on the back end?

[1] https://github.com/tobymao/sqlglot

Wanted to give sqlglot a shoutout as it saved me a ton of time.

This is because 0.1 is in actuality the floating point value value 0.1000000000000000055511151231257827021181583404541015625, and thus 1 divided by it is ever so slightly smaller than 10. Nevertheless, fpround(1 / fpround(1 / 10)) = 10 exactly.

I found out about this recently because in Polars I defined a // b for floats to be (a / b).floor(), which does return 10 for this computation. Since Python's correctly-rounded division is rather expensive, I chose to stick to this (more context: https://github.com/pola-rs/polars/issues/14596#issuecomment-...).

https://github.com/pola-rs/polars/releases/tag/py-0.19.0

That turned out to be related to pola-rs/polars#11912, and this linked comment provided a deceptively simple solution - use PARSE_DECLTYPES when creating the connection: