rust-zmq VS win32metadata

It depends how useful you think the patch is, and maybe also how likely you think it will get merged.

In most cases I simply keep my fork as a PR and use the package either by vendoring or directly from the repo. If anyone else encounters the same bug, they will see my PR referencing the issue, they can do the same.

If many people are encountering the bug and using the package, and/or if the project seems dead, then it's a good idea to publish. You can do username prefix or you can just add "2" at the end. I've seen this for other repos, This is what https://crates.io/crates/zmq2 did while https://crates.io/crates/zmq was inactive, though it seems like the latter's maintainer became active and merged what the former's maintainer had done.

I have been using https://crates.io/crates/zmq since 2015 (shortly after rust 1.0 was announced) in production with pub-sub, request-reply and router without any issue. Processes about 5k msg/seconds (mid-freq market data).

I learned a lot about sockets with the library ZeroMQ, although at that time I was using the Python version. This library also has a Rust library, although it doesn't look like the amazing guide about sockets allows you to select Rust as of yet. Still I would recommend going through this guide, as it is not just teaching you how to use a library, but also teaches you about sockets at a theoretical level. It's entertaining to read as well.

I think maybe the ZeroMQ rust crate as a case study is something that is non-trivial: https://github.com/erickt/rust-zmq

As /u/huellenoperator notes, that this needs a pointer to a mutable string comes straight from microsoft through win32metadata. Maybe it's a mistake on Microsoft's side, but if it's not you're taking big risks.

Microsoft offers official "bindings" to Win32 APIs through win32metadata. However, until recently, it did not include metadata for kernel-level functions or WDK. In early 2021, an issue was raised through windows-rs regarding this limitation, but progress was slow until now. Microsoft has finally released official metadata for WDK, which can be found on the wdkmetadata repository. The latest comment on the issue thread can be found here:

for win32metadata's kernel api tracking issue, https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata/issues/401

Any examples? Since the API bindings in windows-sys are generated from the metadata generated from official Windows SDK headers I'd not expect to see this kind of difference.

You might also look at this project: https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata

There is still the occasional incredibly subtle link time fuckery in Rust.

https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata/issues/1274

"Minor" semver updates to crates breaking things via e.g. unexpected MSRV bumps is pretty common too, with some resulting bitrot. That said, I agree with you that things in Rust are at least better. Imperfect, but better.

Win32 is available as metadata to enable adoption in as many languages as possible. Are there some things missing? Yes. The Microsoft team acknowledges that and encourages asking for the things you need so they can add them to the metadata.

It might be interesting to have bindings generated for the entirety of Win32 API through https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata

Hi JB! Funny to cross paths with you in this context. I don't know if you remember me but I was a rookie programmer who got the pleasure of joining the VideoLan Conference in Dublin back in 2014, and then Paris the next year, and you were very kind to me.

The GitHub issue title here is unfortunately misleading. I have renamed it to "ideas to improve windows header files and libc". Also, I hope it is clear that I rebutted the points made by the OP, because I completely agree with your summary that the mingw-w64 people are skilled, nice and very clever and think about all use cases.

If any drive-by HN readers work at Microsoft, please help us with this issue: https://github.com/microsoft/win32metadata/issues/766