rust-analyzer VS tree-sitter-rust

go build 3.62s user 0.76s system 171% cpu 2.545 total

I was looking forward to parallel front-end[4], but I have not seen any improvement for these small changes.

[1]: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer

For example, intelephense can show diagnostics in real time, there is no need to save the file to get new diagnostics. But rust-analyzer, the language server for rust, can only update diagnostics after saving the file.

6. Rust Analyzer

The rust-analyzer readme suggests you go here for support request. But even there, you'll need to provide more details to get useful help.

For example: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/blob/master/docs/...

> If you create an LSP, it will work best in VS Code.

Any editor can work just as well as (or even better than) VS Code.

So, apparently the reason why rust-analyzer, the LSP server for Rust does not have persistent caching is because it would make "optimizing initial passes less important".

All I want to know is: Will it have a build configuration pulldown?

I am not a Rust dev. It surely looks great.

However, from what I understand it seems to supply just a parser separate from the Rust compiler (https://github.com/rust-lang/rust-analyzer/tree/master/crate...) trying to keep up with Rust‘s development. So, in principle, it could have been just another treesitter parser plugin, too.

So, again, the LSP framework does not directly provide any magical benefit over a static parsing framework. All the semantic analysis capabilities stem from a good parser.

rust-analyzer > manual > helix > binary > rustup component add rust-analyzer

Yes. It's typically a fair bit slower than a hand-coded parser. The idea sounds great until you're working on a codebase with 2 million LOC. At that point, the speed of a cold parse is most important, whereas TS is designed for fast re-parsing of a single file. These aren't great numbers but the Rust TS parser is reportedly 2x slower than rustc's https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-rust. It's no surprise that you just use the faster option if it's convenient.

(use-package treesit :ensure nil :custom ;; Some stuff taken from here: https://robbmann.io/posts/emacs-treesit-auto/ (treesit-extra-load-path '("/usr/lib64/")) (treesit-language-source-alist '((bash . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-bash")) (c . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c")) (c++ . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-cpp")) (csharp . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-c-sharp")) (css . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-css")) (elixir ("https://github.com/elixir-lang/tree-sitter-elixir")) (html . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-html")) (java . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-java")) (javascript . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-javascript")) (json . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-json")) (lua . ("https://github.com/Azganoth/tree-sitter-lua")) (makefile . ("https://github.com/alemuller/tree-sitter-make")) (org . ("https://github.com/milisims/tree-sitter-org")) (python . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-python")) (tsx . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-typescript" "master" "tsx/src")) (typescript . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-typescript" "master" "typescript/src")) (ruby . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-ruby")) (rust . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-rust")) (sql . ("https://github.com/m-novikov/tree-sitter-sql")) (toml . ("https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-toml")) (yaml . ("https://github.com/ikatyang/tree-sitter-yaml")))) (major-mode-remap-alist '((c-mode . c-ts-mode) (c++-mode . c++-ts-mode) (csharp-mode . csharp-ts-mode) (css-mode . css-ts-mode) (html-mode . html-ts-mode) (java-mode . java-ts-mode) (js-mode . js-ts-mode) (json-mode . json-ts-mode) (makefile-mode . makefile-ts-mode) ;; (org-mode . org-ts-mode) ;; not mature yet (python-mode . python-ts-mode) (typescript-mode . typescript-ts-mode) (ruby-mode . ruby-ts-mode) (rust-mode . rust-ts-mode) (toml-mode . toml-ts-mode) (yaml-mode . yaml-ts-mode))) (treesit-auto-fallback-alist '((toml-ts-mode . conf-toml-mode) (typescript-ts-mode . nil) (tsx-ts-mode . nil))) (treesit-font-lock-settings t) (treesit-simple-indent t) (treesit-defun-type-regexp t)) (use-package treesit-auto :demand t :config (setq treesit-auto-install t) (global-treesit-auto-mode))

Notes for anyone interested, there is this PR https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-rust/pull/128, which merges successive doc comments.

Tree-sitter is a fantastic parser generation and incremental parsing library, that supports Rust language bindings and has an available parser Rust tree-sitter-rust.

You can see a much more in-depth version at https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-typescript or https://github.com/tree-sitter/tree-sitter-rust

I'll be really interested to see what folks end up preferring once nvim 0.5 ships with treesitter support. Do folks have any experience with the Rust grammar?