rumqtt VS rust

https://github.com/bytebeamio/rumqtt

Disclaimer: have not tried it myself. I was, however, considering using it to replace Mosquitto as a broker.

Other crates like https://crates.io/crates/paho-mqtt and https://github.com/bytebeamio/rumqtt are not available for browsers and do not compile to wasm.

Recently lot of new contributors showed interest, as well as contributed to rumqtt, so thank you so much everyone for your support <3 Feel free to discuss anything in comments, if you wish to contribute as well, you can look for `good-first-issues` ( or open new issues here )

GitHub release - rumqttd-0.15.0

there is already an issue open for it: https://github.com/bytebeamio/rumqtt/issues/432. It is something that we would love to have, but not something in priority.

I wanted to let you know that rumqttc, a Rust MQTT client library, now supports several new features in MQTT 5 protocol. If you're not familiar with MQTT, it's a lightweight messaging protocol designed for IoT devices with limited resources.

I know I should have asked this in their issues, but someone already did and didn't get a response. So I was not sure whether to create another issue, or comment in the same one (and not get a response as well?). So I decided to ask on Reddit first, thank you! https://github.com/bytebeamio/rumqtt/issues/598

Here's an example of someone citing a disagreement between CRT and shell32:

https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/44650

This in addition to the Rust CVE mentioned elsewhere in the thread which was rooted in this issue:

https://blog.rust-lang.org/2024/04/09/cve-2024-24576.html

Here are some quick programs to test contrasting approaches. I don't have examples of inputs where they parse differently on hand right now, but I know they exist. This was also a problem that was frequently discussed internally when I worked at MSFT.

    #include 

> instead of choosing a certain numbered version of the random library (if I remember correctly) I let cargo download the latest version which had a completely different API.

Yeah, they didn't follow the instructions and got burned. I still think that multiple things went wrong simultaneously for that experience. I wonder if more prevalent uses of `#[doc(alias = "name")]` being leveraged by https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120730 (which now that I check only accounts for methods and not functions, I should get on that!) so that when changing APIs around people at least get a slightly better experience.

Almost fixed the compiler: https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/123325

Rust: A secure, efficient, and modern programming language (omitting ten thousand words). You can simply follow the installation instructions provided on the official website.

Recently did something similar in Rust but for generating SVGs. We've adopted it for snapshot testing of cargo and rustc's output. Don't have a good PR handy for showing Github's rendering of changes in the SVG (text, side-by-side, swiping) but https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/121877/files has newly added SVGs.

To see what is supported, see the screenshot in the docs: https://docs.rs/anstyle-svg/latest/anstyle_svg/

We strongly believe in Rust as a powerful language for building production-grade software, especially for systems like ours that run alongside Kubernetes.

The above Assert<{N % 2 == 1}> requires #![feature(generic_const_exprs)] and the nightly toolchain. See https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/76560 for more info.