robonomics
Robonomics node implementation for Polkadot ecosystem. Kusama Parachain slot '2048' since January'2022. (by airalab)
polkadot
Polkadot Node Implementation (by paritytech)
| robonomics | polkadot | |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 143 | |
| 216 | 7,026 | |
| 0.0% | - | |
| 2.8 | 9.7 | |
| about 2 months ago | 8 months ago | |
| Rust | Rust | |
| Apache License 2.0 | GNU General Public License v3.0 only |
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
robonomics
Posts with mentions or reviews of robonomics.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects.
-
Welcome to the Robonomics community!
- GitHub
polkadot
Posts with mentions or reviews of polkadot.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-12-06.
-
Projects to contribute to
Polkadot (6400 GitHub Stars) https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot
-
There are 43 active parachains on Polkadot, not counting private ones, and 130 total announced projects headed for parachain status. When is the relay chain going to be upgraded to handle more than 100 parachains?
I don't think asynchronous backing has any direct effect on the number of parachains, no (I mean, there likely is an effect, but it's not the goal and my understanding is that any effect on that would be minimal, although I'm not involved in the deep engineering here). It increases throughput, correct, by decreasing the time between blocks by not needing to do a "roundtrip" to the relay chain to build new blocks. See https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/3779 for an overview.
-
Polkadot Staking Alternatives in light of Kraken US's staking closure
"The 27 waiting day is unavoidable and a very important security measure to protect against certain attacks and vulnerabilities of PoS. I totally understand that it is annoying, but arguably it is for the benefit+security of the overall network, which includes you as well at the end of the day as DOT-holder." - from this GitHub discussion.
- Polkadot Surpasses Cardano To Rank Top In Crypto Development Activity
-
Can we change the 28 day unbonding lockup period?
Ref: Kianenigma @ https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/2418
-
Polkadot Digest 19 Jan 2023
Polkadot 0.9.37 has been released with MEDIUM upgrade priority. https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/releases/tag/v0.9.37
- Minimum Active Bond jumped from 237 to 248.5 in 8 eras :(
-
Polkadot Digest 17 Jan 2023
Specifically, it was this PR that changed it: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/pull/6230
-
Question about controller address when staking.
Actually it looks like you can! It's just not recommended. This is from the official documentation: "Starting with runtime version v23 natively included in the client version 0.8.23, payouts can go to any custom address. If you'd like to redirect payments to an account that is neither the controller nor the stash account, set one up. Note that setting an exchange address as the recipient of the staking rewards is extremely unsafe.*
-
Bill Laboon AMA 9 Dec 2022 - 14.00-15.00 UTC
A particular validator sent out a LOT of dispute reports (i.e., saying that other validators did something incorrectly) last night (for reasons unknown). It looks like other nodes "choked" reading all of these disputes, and one subsystem died, stalling nodes but NOT killing the process. It's still being investigated, but you can look at the issue on Github to see it being discussed here: https://github.com/paritytech/polkadot/issues/6412
What are some alternatives?
When comparing robonomics and polkadot you can also consider the following projects:
Acala - Acala - cross-chain DeFi hub and stablecoin based on Substrate for Polkadot and Kusama.
substrate - Substrate: The platform for blockchain innovators
HydraDX-node - HydraDX node - cross-chain liquidity protocol built on Substrate
parity-signer - Air-gapped crypto wallet.
subsocial-solochain - NOTE: Development continues in https://github.com/dappforce/subsocial-parachain repo. Subsocial full node with Substrate/Polkadot pallets for decentralized communities: blogs, posts, comments, likes, reputation.
ledger-kusama - Kusama app for Ledger Nano S and X
Polkadex - An Orderbook-based Decentralized Exchange using the Substrate Blockchain Framework.
rust - Rust language bindings for TensorFlow
open-runtime-module-library - Substrate Open Runtime Module Library
Parity - (deprecated) The fast, light, and robust client for the Ethereum mainnet.
substrate-archive - Blockchain Indexing Engine
cumulus - Write Parachains on Substrate
robonomics vs Acala
polkadot vs substrate
robonomics vs HydraDX-node
polkadot vs parity-signer
robonomics vs subsocial-solochain
polkadot vs ledger-kusama
robonomics vs Polkadex
polkadot vs rust
robonomics vs open-runtime-module-library
polkadot vs Parity
robonomics vs substrate-archive
polkadot vs cumulus