rmrl
logseq
rmrl | logseq | |
---|---|---|
10 | 545 | |
113 | 30,005 | |
- | 2.4% | |
0.0 | 9.9 | |
over 2 years ago | 4 days ago | |
Python | Clojure | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 only | GNU Affero General Public License v3.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
rmrl
-
Show HN: Obsidian Canvas – An infinite space for your ideas
Cool project! Note that if you want to support the Remarkable scribbles, there's a Python project that does that:
https://github.com/rschroll/rmrl
-
PFD & PNG
If you need a high detail at the cost of cosmetics (e.g. pencil texture), rmrl is a pretty good renderer: https://github.com/rschroll/rmrl
-
New Yorker: Can “Distraction-Free” Devices Change the Way We Write?
100% and yet it's still worth it. I write this as a programmer meaning that, ironically enough, my distraction is when I pick the reMarkable to start reading or sketching but despite the minimalist setup still get distracted. Not by social network notifications or the possibility of a web search but rather here for example to suggest you https://github.com/rschroll/rmrl for your PDF and if its too limited (it always is) to consider what prototypes I could build that challenge the very way I read and write. I believe it's worst for researchers because the process itself must be described in order to publish a result. One must step back and describe the experiment so that it can be both challenged and reproduced. Consequently there is always on the back of the mind a simple and justified question "Is this the right way to do that?". I believe it is quite taxing but it still worth because, and that's just my view, thinking itself relies extensively on tools. We like to imagine that it's a pure process of the mind but for any complex enough thought, we need tools. We run simulations, we sketch diagram, we organize a bibliography which represents the thoughts and experiments of others, etc. This is literally unmanageable without tools regardless of ones "intelligence". This in turns mean that the better the tool, at least in regard to the final goal, the further one can go.
-
Any way to export a folder with multiple notebooks?
Then use https://github.com/rschroll/rmrl to convert the data files you get from the previous point to pdf.
-
Command line tool to convert page to png or pdf on the device, or from a third party?
I love this tool: https://github.com/rschroll/rmrl
-
Programmatically changing the opened notebook
Reading/parsing .rm files has been already implemented by these 2 Python libraries: * https://github.com/bsdz/remarkable-layers (not maintained any longer) * https://github.com/rschroll/rmrl (looks up-to-date)
-
PSA: rsync, cryptsetup and veritysetup binaries now included in 2.8 update
This would also be less of an issue if you ran your own infrastructure (see rmfakecloud, or use something like Syncthing or Nextcloud together with rmrl for file conversion).
-
Issue w/ highlighter tool (beta 2.7.0.30)
This has been a gripe of mine for a while. The problem is that reMarkable isn't implementing the PDF standard correctly. Their highlights are just visual overlays but not Annotation objects. I have submitted a pull request to the RMRL python library to fix this, but the author has not been responsive. I also submitted a support request referencing the specific standard, but I'm not holding my breath. In the mean time you can always try using my version of RMRL, but it requires use of the command line and a working python install.
-
Ondevice .rm to .svg/.pdf conversion
One way to manage the issue, would be to look into rmlr, install python and pip via Entware/Toltec, and try to have rmlr running on the RM if all the dependencies can be found for the ARM architecture.
- rmrl: reMarkable Rendering Library
logseq
- Open-Source Obsidian Alternative
-
What is Omnivore and How to Save Articles Using this Tool
Logseq support via our Logseq Plugin
- Logseq: A privacy-first, open-source knowledge base
-
Notes on Emacs Org Mode
Sorry, but _what exactly_ «it seems to do» from your point of view?
My «second brain» now is almost 300Mb of text, pictures, sound files, PDF and other stuff. As I already mentioned, it contains tables, mathematical formulae, sheet music, cross-references, code samples, UML diagrams and graphs in Graphviz format. It is versioned, indexed by local search engine, analyzed by AI assistant and shared between many computers and mobile devices. And (last but not least) it works: it allows me to solve my tasks way more faster than with the assistant of external, non-personalized tools (like ChatGPT, StackExchange or Google).
I know no tools for all this tasks except org-mode. Well, maybe Evernote in the 2010-s was something similar — but with less features, with more bugs and with worse interface.
Personal note-taking _is_ a complex task per se (well, at least for someone like typical HN visitor). I've seen many note-taking tools, that were ridiculously featureless, stupid and inconvenient because they were _not_ complex enough.
> Sure if one wants to do emacs-gardening it is fine.
1)You can use org-mode outside Emacs. See for example Logseq (https://logseq.com/), organice (https://organice.200ok.ch/) or EasyOrg.
2)Org-mode works in Emacs out of the box, you don't need any «emacs-gardening» to use org-mode.
3)The term «Emacs-gardening» itself sound a bit like hate-speech for me. The complexity of Emacs customization is overrated, mostly due to opinions of people who never used Emacs or used it in the previous millennium.
-
Why I Like Obsidian
Obsidian is great.
For those looking for an open source alternative (or don't want to pay the Obsidian fees for professional usage) check out Logseq: https://logseq.com/
-
Obsidian 1.5 Desktop (Public)
For an opensource alternative to Obsidian checkout Logseq (1). I spent a while thinking obsidian was opensource out of my own ignorance and was disappointed when I learned it was not.
1: https://logseq.com/
-
logseq VS Einwurf - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 20 Dec 2023
- Notesnook – open-source and zero knowledge private note taking app
-
How do you track your daily tasks?
I use logseq to keep journal of my daily work.
-
I'm a science student and amateur web dev. Is this the right tool?
While Emacs and Org mode can certainly be used for this (and, when they can't, you can always inject little python/js scripts in your emacs config to take care of specific things), I'd also recommend you take a look at Logseq.
What are some alternatives?
remarkable-layers - Python module for reading and writing Remarkable Lines files
obsidian-mind-map - An Obsidian plugin for displaying markdown notes as mind maps using Markmap.
rmStorageTools - Based on rmWebUiTools but uses local flat files and rmrl!
obsidian-dataview - A data index and query language over Markdown files, for https://obsidian.md/.
scrypt-js - Pure JavaScript implementation of the scrypt password-based key derivation function.
Zettlr - Your One-Stop Publication Workbench
remarks - Extract annotations (highlights and scribbles) from PDF, EPUB, and notebooks marked with reMarkable tablets. Export to Markdown, PDF, PNG, SVG
Joplin - Joplin - the secure note taking and to-do app with synchronisation capabilities for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android and iOS.
rmrl - Render reMarkable documents to PDF
athens - Athens is a knowledge graph for research and notetaking. Athens is open-source, private, extensible, and community-driven.
rmapi - Go app that allows you to access your reMarkable tablet files through the Cloud API
AppFlowy - AppFlowy is an open-source alternative to Notion. You are in charge of your data and customizations. Built with Flutter and Rust.