RE2
vim-matchup
RE2 | vim-matchup | |
---|---|---|
49 | 37 | |
8,628 | 1,602 | |
0.5% | - | |
8.9 | 6.7 | |
3 days ago | 8 days ago | |
C++ | Vim Script | |
BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
RE2
-
C Is the Greenest Programming Language
Looking at the benchmark where C++ is worst compared to other languages, it's depending on the library used. I would guess if they used Google's re2 Regex library instead of Boost's, the result would be different.
https://github.com/google/re2
https://github.com/greensoftwarelab/Energy-Languages/blob/ma...
-
what does this + do in the regular expression "(^A-Za-z)+"
That page says it just includes "some of the most common special characters", and following the link to the Examples page in turn includes a link to the full list.
-
On a Great Interview Question
Python uses backtracking, so this probably isn't O(n), especially with the ability to choose the dictionary.
But with there are non-backtracking matchers which would make this O(n). Here's re2 from https://github.com/google/re2 :
>>> import re2
-
RE2 VS hyperscan - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 17 Mar 2023
-
hyperscan VS RE2 - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 17 Mar 2023
RE2 is a Google regular expression library
-
Projects ideas to learn C++/OOP
google's regex library: https://github.com/google/re2
-
Regex: is there a difference between * and {0,}, as well as + and {1,}?
I am currently working with Regex, specifically Re2, and was wondering if there is a real difference between the above expressions for repeated sub-regex.
-
First release of SPVM::File::Spec - complex regular expressions, file tests, SPVM::Cwd, inheritance
I ported Google RE2, a regular expression library, to SPVM as Resource::Re2, and created SPVM::Regex, a wrapper for it.
-
SPVM::File::Basename is released. This is the first module of SPVM using regular expressions.
I searched for I found that there is a Perl compatible regular expression called Google RE2. It is written in C++, and with Google RE2, I can use Perl-compatible regular expressions as a library.
-
Ruby 3.2.0 Is from Another Dimension
Yes, but there is an interesting clarification here. RE2 has used the "caching" approach documented in the Ruby bug ticket linked for quite some time (since its birth?): https://github.com/google/re2/blob/954656f47fe8fb505d4818da1...
It is mentioned only briefly in Cox's article on regex matching in the wild. Look for the word "bitstate": https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp3.html
I didn't know Perl had implemented this trick too.
The paper[1] cited in the Ruby bug ticket was published very recently. When I first read the Ruby bug ticket, I immediately wondered how they sidestepped the memory use problem. The paper's abstract seems to suggest there is some technique for doing so, as it rebuffs the idea of doing "full" memoization. Alas, I do not have access the paper. (Which is fucking ridiculous.)
[1]: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9519427
vim-matchup
-
Existing non-lua plugins examples
Then you have all the vimscript plugins, most of which work in neovim too--my favorite of these is vim-matchup
-
Should vim-matchup go into neovim core?
It seems like https://github.com/andymass/vim-matchup is a superior version of both of them, at least that's how it's advertized.
-
Help Mapping Keys
Have you tried vim-matchup?
-
Set it and forget it plugins?
andymass/vim-matchup - nicer %
-
What's your solution to move between " "?
Thank you for you answer! This is the best option I've found by far. But some aditional steps need to be done to enable this behavior. It is documented here vim-matchup
-
Looking for some kinda specific plugins for visibility
vim-matchup does both of this things
-
Matching of Bracket Under Cursor Not Working
If you don't wanna deal with matchparen, you could also consider using vim-matchup, which has better performance than matchparen and can match way more tokens and keywords.
-
Do you use the "%" motion? Do you feel it has "quirks"?
vim-matchup improves these motions.and has a lot of nice features.
-
Which vim plugins do not have a lua equivalent yet?
vim-matchup is written in lua, isn't it? https://github.com/andymass/vim-matchup/tree/master/lua
-
TS-Node-Action: Inline Text Folding
https://github.com/andymass/vim-matchup Plus come custom highlight groups
What are some alternatives?
compile-time-regular-expressions - Compile Time Regular Expression in C++
todo-comments.nvim - ✅ Highlight, list and search todo comments in your projects
semver.c - Semantic version in ANSI C
vim-sandwich - Set of operators and textobjects to search/select/edit sandwiched texts.
Boost.Signals - Boost.org signals2 module
lspkind.nvim - vscode-like pictograms for neovim lsp completion items
libevil - The Evil License Manager
FastFold - Speed up Vim by updating folds only when called-for.
constexpr-8cc - Compile-time C Compiler implemented as C++14 constant expressions
nvim-treesitter-pairs
Cppcheck - static analysis of C/C++ code
neovim - Vim-fork focused on extensibility and usability