pythonfluente2e VS publishing-python-packages

Compare pythonfluente2e vs publishing-python-packages and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
pythonfluente2e publishing-python-packages
1 2
329 76
2.1% -
8.1 0.0
10 days ago 29 days ago
Python Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

pythonfluente2e

Posts with mentions or reviews of pythonfluente2e. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.

publishing-python-packages

Posts with mentions or reviews of publishing-python-packages. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-15.
  • How to improve Python packaging, or why 14 tools are at least 12 too many
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Jan 2023
    I don't agree with all the points from the article, but I do agree there is a depth of learning to be had about creating packages (and doing it repeatably/scalably). I wrote a book about creating Python packages that just came out: https://pypackages.com

    Even this book doesn't cover all options in each area, and it skips almost wholly over conda because I have no personal experience using it. conda and the work in the scientific community adds complexity both to the creation and the consumption side of packaging, and that's one area I'm not sure this post covers all the nuance of when considering how a "one size fits all" solution might work in practice.

  • Publishing Python Packages: available now!
    1 project | /r/learnpython | 15 Dec 2022
    If reading code is more your thing, you might want to check out the code companion.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing pythonfluente2e and publishing-python-packages you can also consider the following projects:

Booklet - Making Booklet file from your own PDF

sigstore-python - A Sigstore client for Python

django-crash-starter - The Cookiecutter template for the Django Crash Course tutorial by Daniel and Audrey Feldroy.

pigar - :coffee: A tool to generate requirements.txt for Python project, and more than that. (IT IS NOT A PACKAGE MANAGEMENT TOOL)

d2l-en - Interactive deep learning book with multi-framework code, math, and discussions. Adopted at 500 universities from 70 countries including Stanford, MIT, Harvard, and Cambridge.

roadmap - Public roadmap for the Poetry package manager

asciidoc-py - Legacy python processor for AsciiDoc

tox-pin-deps - Run tox environments with strictly pinned dependencies (and no project or code changes).

scientific-visualization-book - An open access book on scientific visualization using python and matplotlib

the-code-book - code along to Simon Singh's "The Code Book"