publishing-python-packages VS pigar

Compare publishing-python-packages vs pigar and see what are their differences.

pigar

:coffee: A tool to generate requirements.txt for Python project, and more than that. (IT IS NOT A PACKAGE MANAGEMENT TOOL) (by damnever)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
publishing-python-packages pigar
2 1
76 1,580
- -
0.0 7.0
25 days ago 22 days ago
Python Python
MIT License BSD 3-clause "New" or "Revised" License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

publishing-python-packages

Posts with mentions or reviews of publishing-python-packages. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-15.
  • How to improve Python packaging, or why 14 tools are at least 12 too many
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Jan 2023
    I don't agree with all the points from the article, but I do agree there is a depth of learning to be had about creating packages (and doing it repeatably/scalably). I wrote a book about creating Python packages that just came out: https://pypackages.com

    Even this book doesn't cover all options in each area, and it skips almost wholly over conda because I have no personal experience using it. conda and the work in the scientific community adds complexity both to the creation and the consumption side of packaging, and that's one area I'm not sure this post covers all the nuance of when considering how a "one size fits all" solution might work in practice.

  • Publishing Python Packages: available now!
    1 project | /r/learnpython | 15 Dec 2022
    If reading code is more your thing, you might want to check out the code companion.

pigar

Posts with mentions or reviews of pigar. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-01-15.
  • How to improve Python packaging, or why 14 tools are at least 12 too many
    9 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 15 Jan 2023
    I am the author of pigar[1], and I am using Go a lot, Go has its problems too, but I am a fan of `import "url"` style import statement, developers can write code first, and sync the dependency later with `go mod tidy`.

    To fix problems in Python's world, Python's community should simplify the tools and cultivate a habit to declare the dependency first(maybe this should be mandatory) and use it later.

    [1]: https://github.com/damnever/pigar

What are some alternatives?

When comparing publishing-python-packages and pigar you can also consider the following projects:

sigstore-python - A Sigstore client for Python

req2toml - Convert requirements.txt to poetry toml 🚀

pythonfluente2e - Python Fluente, Segunda Edição

roadmap - Public roadmap for the Poetry package manager

pip-upgrade - Upgrade your pip packages with one line. A fast, reliable and easy tool for upgrading all of your packages while not breaking any dependencies

tox-pin-deps - Run tox environments with strictly pinned dependencies (and no project or code changes).

pip-audit - Audits Python environments, requirements files and dependency trees for known security vulnerabilities, and can automatically fix them

pragmatic-debian-packages - Pragmatic Debian packaging