FreeBSD-src
pfsense-is-closed-source
| FreeBSD-src | pfsense-is-closed-source | |
|---|---|---|
| 9 | 21 | |
| 135 | 121 | |
| 0.0% | - | |
| 10.0 | 0.0 | |
| about 12 hours ago | over 1 year ago | |
| C | ||
| GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | The Unlicense |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
FreeBSD-src
-
How to build ISO from pfsense source code
====>> Removing leftovers from git repo https://github.com/pfsense/freebsd-src.git (devel-12) ====>> Retrieving updates from git repo https://github.com/pfsense/freebsd-src.git (devel-12) ====>> Updating git repo https://github.com/pfsense/freebsd-src.git (devel-12)
-
Call for Testing! pfSense Plus Software Version 23.05 BETA Is Now Available
https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src (devel-main branch, which it defaults to)
-
Wanna test OPNsense 22.1 based on FreeBSD 13? (only for testing)
It's a niche use case involving tagging packets on sr-iov VFs. See https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commit/15873ac96fcc4e81a25d35e735a1fbae9d727360
- What is the difference here between "parent-interface" and "vlan-parent"?
-
Help me find a switch that will strip 802.1q tags
I resolved the issue with OPNSense by recompiling OPNSense's dhclient with a patch submitted a while ago to pfsense: https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commit/15051bfd014b2c1e6972a55f58e25cd6907cac8e
-
pfSense Plus 21.02.2 and pfSense CE 2.5.1 Now Available
FreeBSD source - the source code, with patches of the FreeBSD base.
-
Netgate appears to have removed Scott's latest blog post regarding WireGuard
But how are they supposed to know that people are running some modified FreeBSD version with pre-release patches? That is my point. It's not like pfSense is going out of their way to document what kind of changes they're including in their FreeBSD fork.
-
pfSense is closed source?
But the community edition is fully open source? As available on github: https://github.com/pfsense/pfsense https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src By core do you mean like the main kernel. I don't agree that a company should take someone else is work modify it and then pass it off as there own. to me that is just morally wrong. so in which this falls under false advertisement. Tbh I can see this as a good reason why people are moving away. looks like I have some labbing to do.
-
PfSense Is Closed Source
Here's the pfSense 2.4.5 branch
> This branch is 10723 commits ahead, 281789 commits behind devel-12.
https://github.com/pfsense/FreeBSD-src/commits/RELENG_2_4_5
pfsense-is-closed-source
- Its been a while since PFSENSE Plus was released - Opinion on switching to it?
-
Framework laptop alternative with trackpoint built from NUC by prime computer
I'm reminded of the history of the term "open source" itself.
It came from Eric S Raymond and other folks to counter Free Software/GPL in a more commercially minded way.
I think Richard Stallman said it meant "you can view the source" without necessarily granting any other rights.
I think since then it has been more defined, but there seem to be hidden gotcha's possible. Like maybe https://github.com/rapi3/pfsense-is-closed-source
- Is it possible to set up a virtual Router?
- I just got here and… wow.
- what should i do with this freaking rock?
-
Been using Pfsense until the wireguard fiasco... Wondering about the "proper' edge devices?
Better link to show how hostile Netgate is https://github.com/rapi3/pfsense-is-closed-source
-
Wanted to view what you guys think of this (related to pfsense)
Not trying to start drama. Genuinely curious about this. Is it true that pfsense cannot be built from source? Any one knowledegable enough care to explain if this is indeed true?
- Best Router/Firewall
- Is pfsense going closed source?
-
is pfsense secure? That poorly written wireguard patch make me wonder about the rest of the os
It. Is. Not. Open. Source.
What are some alternatives?
pfSense - Main repository for pfSense
pfsense-still-closedsource - The only purpose of this repository is to document the false advertising of the so-called "open-source" pfSense®™ project. Brought to you courtesy of Netgate/Rubicon Communications LLC/ Electric Sheep Fencing LLC.
FreeBSD-ports - FreeBSD ports tree with pfSense changes
Bumblebee - Bumblebee daemon and client rewritten in C
installer - OPNsense installer v2
linux-surface - Linux Kernel for Surface Devices
pfatt - Enable true bridge mode for AT&T U-Verse and pfSense (this is a fork of an original repository https://github.com/aus/pfatt. Since it is not available anymore, I'll do my best to maintain a copy for people that still need a bypass)
BSDRP - BSD Router Project