papermill VS Nim

Pandas docs > Comparison with spreadsheets: https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/getting_started/comparison/co...

Pandas docs > I/O > Excel files: https://pandas.pydata.org/docs/user_guide/io.html#excel-file...

nteract/papermill: https://github.com/nteract/papermill :

> papermill is a tool for parameterizing, executing, and analyzing Jupyter Notebooks. [...]

> This opens up new opportunities for how notebooks can be used. For example:

> - Perhaps you have a financial report that you wish to run with different values on the first or last day of a month or at the beginning or end of the year, using parameters makes this task easier.

"The World Excel Championship is being broadcast on ESPN" (2022) https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32420925 :

> Computational notebook speedrun ideas:

There is Papermill ... https://github.com/nteract/papermill

https://github.com/jupyter/enhancement-proposals/pull/103#is...

Papermill is one tool for running Jupyter notebooks as reports; with the date in the filename. https://papermill.readthedocs.io/en/latest/

You may be interested in papermill to address the parametrized analysis problem [1]. I think (but I'm not positive) this is what the data team at a previous job used to automate running notebooks for all sorts nightly reports.

[1] https://papermill.readthedocs.io/en/latest/#

I'm using Papermill to operationalize Notebooks (https://github.com/nteract/papermill), it e.g. also has airflow support. I'm really happy with papermill for automatic notebook execution, in my field it's nice that we can go very quickly from analysis to operations -- while having super transparent "logging" in the executed notebooks.

papermill bcpandas fastapi

But you can execute your notebook using Jupyter-run or papermill.

As a first option, we will use Papermill, which has a Python API that allows us to run different notebooks using some functions:

Papermill can also target cloud storage outputs for hosting rendered notebooks, execute notebooks from custom Python code, and even be used within distributed data pipelines like Dagster (see Dagstermill). For more information, see the papermill documentation.

Papermill Source Code

22. Nim - $80,000

I think the right answer to your question would be NimLang[0]. In reality, if you're seeking to use this in any enterprise context, you'd most likely want to select the subset of C++ that makes sense for you or just use C#.

[0]https://nim-lang.org/

I don't think it's a rust-inspired language, but since it has strong typing and compiles to javascript, did you give a look at nim [0] ?

For what it takes, I find the language very expressive without the verbosity in rust that reminds me java. And it is also very flexible.

[0] : https://nim-lang.org/

I see a valid cert for https://nim-lang.org/

FYI, on the front page, https://nim-lang.org, in large type you have this:

> Nim is a statically typed compiled systems programming language. It combines successful concepts from mature languages like Python, Ada and Modula.

You better off with using a compiled language.

If you interested in a language that's compiled, fast, but as easy and pleasant as Python - I'd recommend you take a look at [Nim](https://nim-lang.org).

And to prove what Nim's capable of - here's a cool repo with 100+ cli apps someone wrote in Nim: [c-blake/bu](https://github.com/c-blake/bu)

Chapel has at least several full-time developers at Cray/HPE and (I think) the US national labs, and has had some for almost two decades. That's much more than $100k.

Chapel is also just one of many other projects broadly interested in developing new programming languages for "high performance" programming. Out of that large field, Chapel is not especially related to the specific ideas or design goals of Mojo. Much more related are things like Codon (https://exaloop.io), and the metaprogramming models in Terra (https://terralang.org), Nim (https://nim-lang.org), and Zig (https://ziglang.org).

But Chapel is great! It has a lot of good ideas, especially for distributed-memory programming, which is its historical focus. It is more related to Legion (https://legion.stanford.edu, https://regent-lang.org), parallel & distributed Fortran, ZPL, etc.