operations-mediawiki-config VS minio

Compare operations-mediawiki-config vs minio and see what are their differences.

operations-mediawiki-config

⚙️ Configuration for Wikimedia Foundation wikis. This is a mirror from https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/g/operations/mediawiki-config/. See https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_access for contributing. (by wikimedia)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
operations-mediawiki-config minio
1 105
78 45,627
- 1.8%
9.9 9.9
5 days ago 1 day ago
HTML Go
- GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

operations-mediawiki-config

Posts with mentions or reviews of operations-mediawiki-config. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-10-24.
  • The falsehoods of anti-AGPL propaganda (2020)
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 24 Oct 2021
    > Configuration is just a short artifact. It's not a creative work and is therefore not copyrightable at all, whether by AGPL or otherwise.

    I'm doubtful. For example https://github.com/wikimedia/operations-mediawiki-config is wikipedia's config. It is not short, and much of it is complex enough i think it would be copyrightable (ianal)

    I agree though a very traditional list of key value pairs that are simple facts like where to find the db, might lack creativity to be copyrighted (ianal). But how many real deployed systems have that simple a config. More generally i would prefer that the license was less ambigious about this especially in an international context (e.g. rules are totally different in uk over what can be copyrighted)

    > I'm not convinced obscurity helps against spam at all. DKIM and blocklists have done much more against email spam than any form of "security by obscurity" corporate scheme has.

    Gmail et al use techniques beyond dkim that are secret. However i meant more like web spam where you can't just rely on source vouching for users. For example on wikipedia there is a feature where admins can write "code" that block patterns in edits. When used against persistent vandals, they are often secret lest they use the info to adjust behaviour. That's the type of thing i mean.

    > if you are coordinating with the developers, then you have their explicit permission to temporarily withhold those changes (AGPL copyright holders can still grant exceptions to the license)

    That only works if one entity holds all the copyright. Even then, does that mean forks cannot have coordinated disclosure?

minio

Posts with mentions or reviews of minio. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-07-06.
  • DevOps Isn't Dead, but It's Not in Great Health Either
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jul 2024
    > Just have them upload blobs to S3 or Azure Storage.

    Not everyone can store their data in cloud services, most likely.

    That said, S3 compatible solutions like MinIO might be a good choice: https://github.com/minio/minio or maybe SeaweedFS for something with a more permissive license: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs

  • Curl has native support for –AWS-sigv4
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 6 Jul 2024
  • Como Configurar e Integrar o MiniO com Java
    2 projects | dev.to | 2 Jul 2024
    Repositório Oficial: https://github.com/minio/minio
  • Golang REST API boilerplate
    12 projects | dev.to | 4 Jun 2024
    https://github.com/minio/minio/tree/master/internal #### /internal/pkg Examples:
  • Montrez patte blanche : tuez des mutants !
    8 projects | dev.to | 16 May 2024
  • JuiceFS 1.2 Beta 1: Gateway Upgrade, Enhanced Multi-User Permission Management
    2 projects | dev.to | 5 May 2024
    The core service of JuiceFS Gateway is to expose the POSIX file system via the S3 API. Before v1.2, we integrated the MinIO Gateway module into our code. This module was based on the Apache license. This integration made JuiceFS operations similar to MinIO's native command minio gateway NAS. For users, JuiceFS could be seen as an implementation of MinIO Gateway. MinIO's other backend implementations include NAS and Hadoop.
  • A Distributed File System in Go Cut Average Metadata Memory Usage to 100 Bytes
    2 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 22 Feb 2024
    Looks like minio added this in 2022:

    https://github.com/minio/minio/pull/15433

  • Simulate multi-nodes configuration
    1 project | /r/minio | 6 Dec 2023
    We have this example of docker compose you can adapt to be larger https://github.com/minio/minio/blob/master/docs/orchestration/docker-compose/docker-compose.yaml
  • Ask HN: I have 10 yrs of Exp. Failed 4 takehome projects. What am I doing wrong?
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 11 Jul 2023
    >Again, here you seem to be arguing against a strawman that doesn't know that blocking the IO loop is bad. Try arguing against one that knows ways to work around that. This is why I'm saying this rule isn't true. Extensive computation on single-threaded "scripting" languages is possible (and even if it wasn't, punt it off to a remote pool of workers, which could also be NodeJS!).

    Very rare to find a rule that's absolutely true.. I clearly stated exceptions to the rule (which you repeated) but the generality is still true.

    Threading in nodejs is new and didn't exist since the last time I touched it. It looks like it's not the standard use case as google searches still have websites with titles saying node is single threaded everywhere. The only way I can see this being done is multiple Processes (meaning each with a copy of v8) using OS shared memory as IPC and they're just calling it threads. It will take a shit load of work to make v8 actually multi-threaded.

    Processes are expensive so you can't really follow this model per request. And we stopped following threading per request over a decade ago.

    Again these are exceptions to the rule, from what I'm reading Nodejs is normally still single threaded with a fixed number of worker processes that are called "threads". Under this my general rule is still generally true: backend engineering does no typically involve writing non blocking code and offloading compute to other sources. Again, there are exceptions but as I stated before these exceptions are rare.

    >Here's what I mean -- you can actually solve the ordering problem in O(N) + O(M) time by keeping track of the max you've seen and building a sparse array and running through every single index from max to zero. It's overkill, but it's generally referred to as a counting sort:

    Oh come on. We both know these sorts won't work. These large numbers will throw off memory. Imagine 3 routes. One route gets 352 hits, another route gets 400 hits, and another route gets 600,000 hits. What's Big Oh for memory and sort?

    It's O(600,000) for both memory and runtime. N=3 and it doesn't even matter here. Yeah these types of sorts are almost never used for this reason, they only work for things with smaller ranges. It's also especially not useful for this project. Like this project was designed so "counting sort" fails big time.

    Also we don't need to talk about the O(N) read and write. That's a given it's always there.

    >I don't think these statements make sense -- having docker installed and having redis installed are basically equivalent work. At the end of the day, the outcome is the same -- the developer is capable of running redis locally. Having redis installed on your local machine is absolutely within range for a backend developer.

    Unfortunately these statements do make sense and your characterization seems completely dishonest to me. People like to keep their local environments pure and segregated away from daemons that run in a web server. I'm sure in your universe you are claiming web developers install redis, postgresql and kafka all locally but that just sounds absurd to me. We can agree to disagree but from my perspective I don't think you're being realistic here.

    >Also, remote development is not practiced by many companies -- the only companies I've seen doing thin-clients that are large.

    It's practiced by a large amount and basically every company I've worked at for the past 5 years. Every company has to at least partially do remote dev in order to fully test E2E stuff or integrations.

    >I see it as just spinning up docker, not compose -- you already have access to the app (ex. if it was buildable via a function) so you could spawn redis in a subprocess (or container) on a random port, and then spawn the app.

    Sure. The point is it's hacky to do this without an existing framework. I'll check out that library you linked.

    >I agree that integration testing is harder -- I think there's more value there.

    Of course there's more value. You get more value at higher cost. That's been my entire point.

    >Also, for replicating S3, minio (https://github.com/minio/minio) is a good stand-in. For replicating lambda, localstack (https://docs.localstack.cloud/user-guide/aws/lambda/) is probably reasonable there's also frameworks with some consideration for this (https://www.serverless.com/framework/docs/providers/aws/guid...) built in.

    Good finds. But what about SNS, IOT, Big Query and Redshift? Again my problem isn't about specific services, it's about infra in general.

    >Ah, this is true -- but I think this is what people are testing in interviews. There is a predominant culture/shared values, and the test is literally whether someone can fit into those values.

    No. I think what's going on is people aren't putting much thought into what they're actually interviewing for. They just have some made up bar in their mind whether it's a leetcode algorithm or whether the guy wrote a unit test for the one available pure function for testing.

    >Whether they should or should not be, that's at least partially what interviews are -- does the new team member feel the same way about technical culture currently shared by the team.

    The answer is no. There's always developers who disagree with things and just don't reveal it. Think about the places you worked at. Were you in total agreement? I doubt it. A huge amount of devs are opinionated and think company policies or practices are BS. People adapt.

    >Now in the case of this interview your solution was just fine, even excellent (because you went out of your way to do async io, use newer/easier packaging methodologies, etc), but it's clearly not just that.

    The testing is just a game. I can play the game and suddenly I pass all the interviews. I think this is the flaw with your methodology as I just need to write tests to get in. Google for example in spirit attempted another method which involves testing IQ via algorithms. It's a much higher bar

    The problem with google is that their methodology can also be gamed but it's much harder to game it and often the bar is too high for the actual job the engineer is expected to do.

    I think both methodologies are flawed, but hiring via ignoring raw ability and picking people based off of weirdly specific cultural preferences is the worse of the two hiring methodologies.

    Put it this way. If a company has a strong testing culture, then engineers who don't typically test things will adapt. It's not hard to do, and testing isn't so annoying that they won't do it.

  • Unable to configure a MinIO cluster, pls help
    1 project | /r/selfhosted | 30 Jun 2023
    The answer is here https://github.com/minio/minio/discussions/17543

What are some alternatives?

When comparing operations-mediawiki-config and minio you can also consider the following projects:

operations-puppet - Wikimedia Foundation operates some of the largest collaborative projects in the world. This is the Puppet repo for our servers. This repository is a mirror; see https://www.mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_access for contributing.

Seaweed File System - SeaweedFS is a fast distributed storage system for blobs, objects, files, and data lake, for billions of files! Blob store has O(1) disk seek, cloud tiering. Filer supports Cloud Drive, cross-DC active-active replication, Kubernetes, POSIX FUSE mount, S3 API, S3 Gateway, Hadoop, WebDAV, encryption, Erasure Coding. [Moved to: https://github.com/seaweedfs/seaweedfs]

Mediawiki - 🌻 The collaborative editing software that runs Wikipedia. Mirror from https://gerrit.wikimedia.org/g/mediawiki/core. See https://mediawiki.org/wiki/Developer_access for contributing.

Nextcloud - ☁️ Nextcloud server, a safe home for all your data

archwiki - MediaWiki used on Arch Linux websites (read-only mirror)

GlusterFS - Gluster Filesystem : Build your distributed storage in minutes

Symfony - The Symfony PHP framework

Samba - https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba is the Official GitLab mirror of https://git.samba.org/samba.git -- Merge requests should be made on GitLab (not on GitHub)

Mastodon - Your self-hosted, globally interconnected microblogging community

seaweedfs - SeaweedFS is a fast distributed storage system for blobs, objects, files, and data lake, for billions of files! Blob store has O(1) disk seek, cloud tiering. Filer supports Cloud Drive, cross-DC active-active replication, Kubernetes, POSIX FUSE mount, S3 API, S3 Gateway, Hadoop, WebDAV, encryption, Erasure Coding.

Swift - OpenStack Storage (Swift). Mirror of code maintained at opendev.org.

SFTPGo - Full-featured and highly configurable SFTP, HTTP/S, FTP/S and WebDAV server - S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured

Did you konow that HTML is
the 11th most popular programming language
based on number of metions?