open-interpreter VS autocomplete

I think openinterpreter [1] were one of the first teams in this space along with shroominic code interpreter api and afaik they started with selenium but have expanded to do a lot more os level work but wonder if having a more narrow specialization could help these newer projects be better at the one thing they are focused on.

[1] https://openinterpreter.com/

I taught https://github.com/KillianLucas/open-interpreter how to use https://github.com/ferrislucas/promptr

Then I asked it to add a test suite to a rails side project. It created missing factories, corrected a broken test database configuration, and wrote tests for the classes and controllers that I asked it to.

I didn't have to get involved with mundane details. I did have to intervene here and there, but not much. The tests aren't the best in the world, but IMO they're adding value by at least covering the happy path. They're not as good as an experienced person would write.

I did spend a non-trivial amount of time fiddling with the prompts I used to teach OI about Promptr as well as the prompts I used to get it to successfully create the test suite.

The total cost was around $11 using GPT4 turbo.

I think in this case it was a fun experiment. I think in the future, this type of tooling will be ubiquitous.

My understanding is that ShellGPT aims to be a complete OS assistant. It's similar to Open Interpreter (https://github.com/KillianLucas/open-interpreter).

Shelly is a mini tool at the moment that only generates and executes commands for you.

https://github.com/KillianLucas/open-interpreter Both OpenAI and Local

Yeah there's a program called openinterpreter, It works beautifully. https://openinterpreter.com/

Having contributed to the Fig autocomplete specs, I find this sad. The Amazon product Fig was built into basically works as replacement, which is good. Still, the core value of this product are the open-source autocomplete specs: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete. What's going to happen to that? It looks like they are still using it in the Amazon product. It should definitely be possible for an open-source re-implementation of the Fig UI to use those specs. There is a lot of knowledge encoded in there!

8. Fig

Fig is awesome but with signups blocked[1] for 2+mo already it's also as good as dead ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

* [1]: https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete/issues/2068

https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete is it this?

How is this different than https://fig.io/?

AWS CloudWatch Evidently The worst. No comment. AWS seems to perpetually lack a good DX for developers. It appears that they don't recognize or continually undervalue the importance of roles other than engineers, such as Product Managers or Designers. Very disappointing. However, AWS has recently acquired Fig, so looks like they're now pursuing an acquisition strategy instead. Let's see how it turns it out, and let's hope they don't ruin Fig, since it's such an useful tool.

slightly tangential, but where do people get awesome landing pages like linear(https://fig.io/. has similar landing page) etc. Do they build them in-house or buy templates somewhere? Many of the recently launched YC companies have awesome landing pages. eg. https://automorphic.ai/,

I love this product, have contributed several times to it, and I'm a little torn. One thing I am thinking about now, is that the completion specs are MIT-licensed, and it should be possible to use them to re-implement a basic open-source version of the autocompletion product... https://github.com/withfig/autocomplete