Naemon VS uptime-kuma

Looks like Nagios Core has the same behavior as Naemon Core: https://github.com/naemon/naemon-core/pull/92

With Statusengine you can add a database backend. I for example only use the Naemon fork of Nagios Core for many years now.

You can also look into Naemon, is a fork of nagios (uses even the same config files, have support for nagios plugins and have a way prettier web interface and dashboard making tools https://www.naemon.io

This open-source project "Nagios Plugins for Linux" provides several binary plugins for monitoring (physical and virtual) Linux hosts with Nagios and Nagios-compatible monitoring systems like Icinga and Naemon.

I switched to Naemon years ago. The communication with the devs is very pleasant.

Uptime Kuma can also monitor certificate expiration; you can also enable it to show you how many days are left until it expires.

https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma

2. Uptime Kuma

- Web terminal & live logs

I'm trying it as an alternative to Portainer and I'm loving it. It seems to fit perfectly in my flow.

Code and more info: https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma

(Not affiliated, just a happy user)

FYI - Uptime Kuma supports push-based monitoring as well.

Uptime-Kuma for Watching Services

I have tunnel up and running as described on this page: https://github.com/louislam/uptime-kuma/wiki/Reverse-Proxy-with-Cloudflare-Tunnel

⭐ Uptime-kuma on GitHub

Uptime Kuma is a self-hosted monitoring service that you can use to keep track of the heath of your applications, websites, and APIs. You can configure it to watch services with different types of health checks and set up email notifications for when there are problems. Uptime Kuma also lets you design custom status pages that you can use to share public information about your service health statuses and to manage incidents.