modin VS Kedro

The interesting thing about Polars is that it does not try to be a drop-in replacement to pandas, like Dask, cuDF, or Modin, and instead has its own expressive API. Despite being a young project, it quickly got popular thanks to its easy installation process and its “lightning fast” performance.

Yeah, tried Polars a couple of times: the API seems worse than Pandas to me too. eg the decision only to support autoincrementing integer indexes seems like it would make debugging "hmmm, that answer is wrong, what exactly did I select?" bugs much more annoying. Polars docs write "blazingly fast" all over them but I doubt that is a compelling point for people using single-node dataframe libraries. It isn't for me.

Modin (https://github.com/modin-project/modin) seems more promising at this point, particularly since a migration path for standing Pandas code is highly desirable.

If anyone wants a faster version of pandas it’s not hard to find, modin for example uses multiple cores to speed it up, so if you have 4 cores it’s about 4 times faster than pandas, and has the same API as pandas.

Modin should fit. It implements Pandas APIs with e.g. Ray as backend. https://github.com/modin-project/modin

If you really want speed you should try modin.pandas which makes pandas multi-threaded.

I am guessing XGB is fairly optimised as it is. If you would want to use the sklearn libraries with pandas, look into Modin

Source

Interesting, thanks for sharing. I'll definitely take a look, although at this point I am so comfortable with Snakemake, it is a bit hard to imagine what would convince me to move to another tool. But I like the idea of composable pipelines: I am building a tool (too early to share) that would allow to lay Snakemake pipelines on top of each other using semi-automatic data annotations similar to how it is done in kedro (https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro).

# pyproject.toml [project] dependencies = [ "kedro @ git+https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro@3ea7231", "kedro-datasets[pandas.CSVDataSet,polars.CSVDataSet] @ git+https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro-plugins@3b42fae#subdirectory=kedro-datasets", ]

So there's 2 sides to pipeline management: the actual definition of the pipelines (in code) and how/when/where you run them. Some tools like prefect or airflow do both of them at once, but for the actual pipeline definition I'm a fan of https://kedro.org. You can then use most available orchestrators to run those pipelines on whatever schedule and architecture you want.

We have set up a milestone on GitHub so you can check in on our progress and contribute if you want to. To suggest features to us, report bugs, or just see what we're working on right now, visit the Kedro projects on GitHub.

you could use a project framework like kedro to force you to be more disciplined about how you structure your projects. I'd also recommend checking out this book: Edna Ridge - Guerrilla Analytics: A Practical Approach to Working with Data

Recently I started a position as Developer Advocate for Kedro, an opinionated data science framework, and one of the things we're doing is exploring what are the best open source tools we can use to create our documentation.

You can also check out Kedro, it’s like the Flask for data science projects and helps apply clean code principles to data science code.

An often overlooked framework used by NASA among others is Kedro https://github.com/kedro-org/kedro. Kedro is probably the simplest set of abstractions for building pipelines but it doesn't attempt to kill Airflow. It even has an Airflow plugin that allows it to be used as a DSL for building Airflow pipelines or plug into whichever production orchestration system is needed.