mirkwood_engine VS tetra3d

Actually I did open-source a prototype version : https://github.com/Myu-Unix/mirkwood_engine

So you have a few different questions there. 1) Ebitenui is primarily game based and makes no assumptions on how the ui should look so you are required to provide the graphics for all the widgets. Fyne is great but more opinionated and focused on a desktop experience from what I've seen. 2) Ebitengine is a 2d game engine for go. 3) There is a lib built on top of ebitengine is ebitengine for 3d PS1 level graphics https://github.com/SolarLune/tetra3d 4) I think it could be done but this library isn't built for that. There are libraries for opengl bindings, raylib bindings and a dedicated 3d engine lib though that one looks to be a bit dead http://g3n.rocks/

One option is Tetra3D.

Ebiten targets only 2D (there are exceptions like Tetra3D though), while Raylib targets both 2D and 3D.

The framework is written in Go and open-source, and is available on Github, so feel free to check it out if you're interested. Making a game from scratch is pretty interesting - I'm using Blender as my map editor, and also made an add-on to export data from Blender into Tetra3D for use in creating the game (like setting custom properties, importing paths and animation markers, etc).

Uhhh if you'd like to work with Go, try my hybrid 3D renderer, Tetra3D, maybe?

Sooooo I've been making my own 3D hybrid software / hardware renderer, called Tetra3D, and I thought people here might like to check it out. There's screenshots on the Github, and playable examples in the `examples` directory.

Here's a post letting you all know that I just released v0.1 of Tetra3D, a 3D software renderer for gamedev, written with Golang and Ebiten. I wrote it because I like making games, I wanted to use vanilla Go (rather than an engine with a Golang converter or something like Godot has), and I wanted janky 3D PS1 graphics, dangit