metaflow VS Sacred

I would recommend the following: - https://www.mage.ai/ - https://dagster.io/ - https://www.prefect.io/ - https://metaflow.org/ - https://zenml.io/home

1) I've been looking into [Metaflow](https://metaflow.org/), which connects nicely to AWS, does a lot of heavy lifting for you, including scheduling.

even for people who don't have an ML background there's now a lot of very fully-featured model deployment environments that allow self-hosting (kubeflow has a good self-hosting option, as do mlflow and metaflow), handle most of the complicated stuff involved in just deploying an individual model, and work pretty well off the shelf.

They had to figure out video compression that worked at the volume that they wanted to deliver. They had to build and maintain their own CDN to be able to have a always available and consistent viewing experience. Don’t even get me started on the resiliency tools like hystrix that they were kind enough to open source. I mean, they have their own fucking data science framework and they’re looking into using neural networks to downscale video.. Sound familiar? That’s cause that’s practically the same thing as Nvidia’s DLSS (which upscales instead of downscales).

Check out Metaflow by Netflix

Github Actions, Metaflow and AWS SageMaker are awesome technologies by themselves however they are seldom used together in the same sentence, even less so in the same Machine Learning project.

It's undeniable that leadership is instrumental in any company and project success, however I was intrigued with one of their ML tool choices that helped them reach their goal. I was so curious about this choice that I just had to learn more about it, so in this article will be talking about a sound strategy of effectively scaling your AI/ML undertaking and a tool that makes this possible - Metaflow.

🔗 https://github.com/IDSIA/sacred

I'm using Omniboard (https://github.com/vivekratnavel/omniboard) with Sacred (https://github.com/IDSIA/sacred) for tracking experiments. You can specify custom Observers in Sacred so the model metrics and logs will be saved to a local directory or to a remote DB (e.g., MongoDB). I use a MongoDB database hosted on Atlas. Unlike other suggested options, Sacred and Omniboard are free. Atlas free tier comes with 512MB of free storage which is a huge amount if you're uploading only log files to it.

I'm using Omniboard (https://github.com/vivekratnavel/omniboard) with Sacred (https://github.com/IDSIA/sacred) for tracking experiments. You can specify custom Observers in Sacred so the model metrics and logs will be saved to a local directory or to a remote DB (e.g., MongoDB). I use a MongoDB database hosted on Atlas. Unlike other suggested options, Sacred and Omniboard are free. Atlas free tier comes with 512MB of free storage which is a huge amount if you're uploading only log files to it. ex = Experiment() ex.observers.append(FileStorageObserver(EXPERIMENTS_ROOT)) ex.observers.append(MongoObserver(url=MONGODB_URL, db_name='sacred'))

sacred helped me log my experiments. I did setup my environment only once 4 years ago, and since then I have a list of all my training runs with the hyperparameters and results.

For 1, setup an experiment tracking framework. I found Sacred to be helpful https://github.com/IDSIA/sacred.