luigi VS ploomber

I agree there are many options in this space. Two others to consider:

- https://airflow.apache.org/

- https://github.com/spotify/luigi

There are also many Kubernetes based options out there. For the specific use case you specified, you might even consider a plain old Makefile and incrond if you expect these all to run on a single host and be triggered by a new file showing up in a directory…

Maybe if your use case is “smallish” and doesn’t require the whole studio suite you could check out apscheduler for doing python “tasks” on a schedule and luigi to build pipelines.

What are you trying to do? Distributed scheduler with a single instance? No database? Are you sure you don't just mean "a scheduler" ala Luigi? https://github.com/spotify/luigi

It's good to know what Airflow is not the only one on the market. There are Dagster and Spotify Luigi and others. But they have different pros and cons, be sure that you did a good investigation on the market to choose the best suitable tool for your tasks.

MLOps is a HUGE area to explore, and not surprisingly, there are many startups showing up in this space. If you want to get it on the latest trends, then I would look at workflow orchestration frameworks such as Metaflow (started off at Netflix, is now spinning off into its own enterprise business, https://metaflow.org/), Kubeflow (used at Google, https://www.kubeflow.org/), Airflow (used at Airbnb, https://airflow.apache.org/), and Luigi (used at Spotify, https://github.com/spotify/luigi). Then you have the model serving itself, so there is Seldon (https://www.seldon.io/), Torchserve (https://pytorch.org/serve/), and TensorFlow Serving (https://www.tensorflow.org/tfx/guide/serving). You also have the actual export and transfer of DL models, and ONNX is the most popular here (https://onnx.ai/). Spark (https://spark.apache.org/) still holds up nicely after all these years, especially if you are doing batch predictions on massive amount of data. There is also the GitFlow way of doing things and Data Version Control (DVC, https://dvc.org/) is taken a pole position there.

At Wonderflow we're doing a lot of ML / NLP using Python and recently we are enjoying writing data pipelines using Spotify's Luigi.

💡【About Luigi】 https://github.com/spotify/luigi Luigi was built at Spotify since 2012, it's open source and mainly used for getting data insights by showing recommendations, toplists, A/B test analysis, external reports, internal dashboards, etc.

So to sum that up, I went from having nothing for my side-project set up in AWS to having a Kubernetes cluster with the basic metrics and dashboard, a proper IAM-linked ServiceAccount support for a smooth IAM experience in K8s, and Luigi deployed so that I could then run a Luigi workflow using an ad-hoc run of a CronJob. That's quite remarkable to me. All that took hours to figure out and define when I first did it, over six months ago.

- One-click sharing powered by Ploomber Cloud: https://ploomber.io

Documentation: https://jupysql.ploomber.io

Note that JupySQL is a fork of ipython-sql; which is no longer actively developed. Catherine, ipython-sql's creator, was kind enough to pass the project to us (check out ipython-sql's README).

We'd love to learn what you think and what features we can ship for JupySQL to be the best SQL client! Please let us know in the comments!

For those who don't know, Jupyter has a bash kernel: https://github.com/takluyver/bash_kernel

And you can run Jupyter notebooks from the CLI with Ploomber: https://github.com/ploomber/ploomber

Develop notebook-based pipelines

Fair point. MLflow has a lot of features to cover the end-to-end dev cycle. This SQLite tracker only covers the experiment tracking part.

We have another project to cover the orchestration/pipelines aspect: https://github.com/ploomber/ploomber and we have plans to work on the rest of features. For now, we're focusing on those two.

I recommend taking a look at the ploomber open source. It helps you structure your code and parameterize it in a way that's easier to maintain and test. Our blog has lots of resources about it from testing your code to building a data science platform on AWS.

Developing end-to-end data science infrastructure can get complex. For example, many of us might have struggled to try to integrate AWS services and deal with configuration, permissions, etc. At Ploomber, we’ve worked with many companies in a wide range of industries, such as energy, entertainment, computational chemistry, and genomics, so we are constantly looking for simple solutions to get them started with Data Science in the cloud.

If you like working locally with notebooks, you can run via the free tier of ploomber, that'll allow you to get the Ram/Compute you need for the bigger models as part of the free tier. Also, it has the historical executions so you don't need to remember what you executed an hour later!

It really depends on your use cases, I've seen a lot of those tools that lock you into a certain syntax, framework or weird language (for instance Groovy). If you'd like to use core python or Jupyter notebooks I'd recommend Ploomber, the community support is really strong, there's an emphasis on observability and you can deploy it on any executor like Slurm, AWS Batch or Airflow. In addition, there's a free managed compute (cloud edition) where you can run certain bioinformatics flows like Alphafold or Cripresso2

That's what we do for lineage with https://ploomber.io/