luigi VS orchest

I agree there are many options in this space. Two others to consider:

- https://airflow.apache.org/

- https://github.com/spotify/luigi

There are also many Kubernetes based options out there. For the specific use case you specified, you might even consider a plain old Makefile and incrond if you expect these all to run on a single host and be triggered by a new file showing up in a directory…

Maybe if your use case is “smallish” and doesn’t require the whole studio suite you could check out apscheduler for doing python “tasks” on a schedule and luigi to build pipelines.

What are you trying to do? Distributed scheduler with a single instance? No database? Are you sure you don't just mean "a scheduler" ala Luigi? https://github.com/spotify/luigi

It's good to know what Airflow is not the only one on the market. There are Dagster and Spotify Luigi and others. But they have different pros and cons, be sure that you did a good investigation on the market to choose the best suitable tool for your tasks.

MLOps is a HUGE area to explore, and not surprisingly, there are many startups showing up in this space. If you want to get it on the latest trends, then I would look at workflow orchestration frameworks such as Metaflow (started off at Netflix, is now spinning off into its own enterprise business, https://metaflow.org/), Kubeflow (used at Google, https://www.kubeflow.org/), Airflow (used at Airbnb, https://airflow.apache.org/), and Luigi (used at Spotify, https://github.com/spotify/luigi). Then you have the model serving itself, so there is Seldon (https://www.seldon.io/), Torchserve (https://pytorch.org/serve/), and TensorFlow Serving (https://www.tensorflow.org/tfx/guide/serving). You also have the actual export and transfer of DL models, and ONNX is the most popular here (https://onnx.ai/). Spark (https://spark.apache.org/) still holds up nicely after all these years, especially if you are doing batch predictions on massive amount of data. There is also the GitFlow way of doing things and Data Version Control (DVC, https://dvc.org/) is taken a pole position there.

At Wonderflow we're doing a lot of ML / NLP using Python and recently we are enjoying writing data pipelines using Spotify's Luigi.

💡【About Luigi】 https://github.com/spotify/luigi Luigi was built at Spotify since 2012, it's open source and mainly used for getting data insights by showing recommendations, toplists, A/B test analysis, external reports, internal dashboards, etc.

So to sum that up, I went from having nothing for my side-project set up in AWS to having a Kubernetes cluster with the basic metrics and dashboard, a proper IAM-linked ServiceAccount support for a smooth IAM experience in K8s, and Luigi deployed so that I could then run a Luigi workflow using an ad-hoc run of a CronJob. That's quite remarkable to me. All that took hours to figure out and define when I first did it, over six months ago.

You can check out our OSS https://github.com/orchest/orchest

The code example is part of our ELT/data pipeline tool called Orchest: https://github.com/orchest/orchest/

First want to say congrats to the Patterns team for creating a gorgeous looking tool. Very minimal and approachable. Massive kudos!

Disclaimer: we're building something very similar and I'm curious about a couple of things.

One of the questions our users have asked us often is how to minimize the dependence on "product specific" components/nodes/steps. For example, if you write CI for GitHub Actions you may use a bunch of GitHub Action references.

Looking at the `graph.yml` in some of the examples you shared you use a similar approach (e.g. patterns/openai-completion@v4). That means that whenever you depend on such components your automation/data pipeline becomes more tied to the specific tool (GitHub Actions/Patterns), effectively locking in users.

How are you helping users feel comfortable with that problem (I don't want to invest in something that's not portable)? It's something we've struggled with ourselves as we're expanding the "out of the box" capabilities you get.

Furthermore, would have loved to see this as an open source project. But I guess the second best thing to open source is some open source contributions and `dcp` and `common-model` look quite interesting!

For those who are curious, I'm one of the authors of https://github.com/orchest/orchest

Haven't tried it. In its favor, Argo is vendor neutral and is really easy to set up in a local k8s environment like docker for desktop or minikube. If you already use k8s for configuration, service discovery, secret management, etc, it's dead simple to set up and use (avoiding configuration having to learn a whole new workflow configuration language in addition to k8s). The big downside is that it doesn't have a visual DAG editor (although that might be a positive for engineers having to fix workflows written by non-programmers), but the relatively bare-metal nature of Argo means that it's fairly easy to use it as an underlying engine for a more opinionated or lower-code framework (orchest is a notable one out now).

If you’d like to try something for you data workflows that’s vendor agnostic (k8s based) and open source you can check out our project: https://github.com/orchest/orchest

You can find it here: https://github.com/orchest/orchest Convenience install script: https://github.com/orchest/orchest#installation

We automatically provide container level parallelism in Orchest: https://github.com/orchest/orchest

For people in this thread interested in what this tool is an alternative to: Airflow, Luigi, Kubeflow, Kedro, Flyte, Metaflow, Sagemaker Pipelines, GCP Vertex Workbench, Azure Data Factory, Azure ML, Dagster, DVC, ClearML, Prefect, Pachyderm, and Orchest.

Disclaimer: author of Orchest https://github.com/orchest/orchest