libadalang VS mathesar

3) most any project on https://www.adacore.com/

There are also tools like gnatcheck and CodePeer, but I don't know if there if there are free versions available. Some of the tools that used to require ASIS have switched to libadalang because ASIS works only with code that compiles.

for more information about the language visit:

My wild guess: AdaCore is doing again something with the page. From time to time, weird things happens to www.adacore.com, like it showing old version of page, etc. I can only suggest waiting a moment (like a long moment :) ). Probably until Tuesday everything should back to normal. If not, then at least will be some statement from AdaCore.

AdaCore took it upon itself to proselytize the language, and even make and open source a bunch of tools for the community. Just between libadalang and Ada Language Server, they've already probably undermined a lot of their business model by providing the tools for modern IDE integration for free, seemingly for the sake of trying to make the language more relevant again. They've given people like myself, the opportunity to exist outside of their paid and closed ecosystem using tools like Visual Studio Code, and even done things like fix multiple bugs and implement several features I've requested.

I dont know for sure, but it might be the language that Garmin uses given that one of the images on Adacore.com looks like a G1000 cockpit.

Congratulations on launching, it's nice to see more open source products in this area (I work on https://mathesar.org/). Feel free to reach out if you'd like to talk and compare notes.

This is what we're trying to do with [Mathesar](https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar). We probably don't meet your needs yet because we don't support real-time concurrent editing, but we're actively working on the project and it is early days.

I'm an engineer on the Mathesar core team and I'd just like to clarify that Mathesar does support grouping to some extent. Here is a screenshot[1] that demonstrates the grouping functionality. Grouping levels are unlimited. You can play with this functionality on our live demo[2]. It's worth mentioning that Mathesar does not yet have the capability to expand and collapse groups, but that feature is planned[3].

Best of luck building Visual DB! Nice to see more innovation in this space!

[1]: https://mathesar.org/assets/crm-table-zoomed.png

[2]: https://demo.mathesar.org/

[3]: https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar/issues/475

I’m not sure if it’s okay to plug my project, but I work on Mathesar (https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar) which can be used as a Postgres GUI. We’re putting a lot of product/design effort into making it nice to use for non technical users.

Otherwise, I just use the command line.

We're trying to do this with Mathesar: https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar. Some feedback would be great!

We're trying to build a community driven project in this space - https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar. We just did our alpha release a couple of months ago.

I'm philosophically opposed to open core (Mathesar is run out of a non-profit), but I can see why other projects do it – finding funding for a big project like this is difficult without VCs (who expect returns).

I'm working on https://mathesar.org/ – it's an open source database solution built on Postgres, you can import data, connect to multiple databases, edit data and build reports. It can't connect to non-Postgres databases, so it may not work for you.

We've just released Mathesar v0.1.2. Major new features are support for multiple databases in the UI and more options for installing Mathesar. We also made a bunch of smaller UX improvements and fixed a few bugs. Our full release notes are here: https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar/releases/tag/0.1.2

We did this for our open source project, Mathesar (https://github.com/centerofci/mathesar), which also uses Django. It's a lot of work. You can take a look at our code if it's helpful.