kb-layout-evaluation VS qmk_firmware

Maybe you can get Portuguese bigrams frequency and run this: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation I don’t know how different it is from French or Spanish.

I wrote a layout analyzer at some point and that was the reasoning.

And indeed quantitative studies tend to show that Colemak can be very good for other languages, for instance French: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation (although you need to modify it slightly to add accented characters to reasonable spots). Interestingly enough, French variant of Qwerty (Azerty) is much worse than Colemak or anything.

A while ago I coded a little comparison between layouts to help me with that decision, you might find it useful: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation

> Some forward-thinking people have set about evaluating key layouts objectively on metrics like these.

[...]

> What If You’re Bilingual?

On that topic some might be interested in this little analysis:

https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation

These scoring systems already exist. Here's the first one I found: https://github.com/bclnr/kb-layout-evaluation

There's not much documentation on userspace stuff as far as I know, but you can check out my ferris keymap as an example on how to use it: qmk_firmware/keymap.c at master · winterNebs/qmk_firmware (github.com)

Keymap will probably be my next video, if you don’t mind the raw source you can check it out here until then: https://github.com/winterNebs/qmk_firmware/blob/winternebsg/keyboards/gboards/k/gergoplex/keymaps/winternebs/keymap.c