jbox2d VS Box2D

“Wrapper” means that the library is just a bit of code that will bridge JBox2D (a Java 2D library) with Processing. It “wraps” the original code in a more appealing package. In other words, it helps you do anything that http://www.jbox2d.org/ can do but in Processing.

I used the jbox2d library: http://www.jbox2d.org/

Yes it can be used for 3D printing. And yes it can be used for game development. Personally if you're interested in 3D game development go with Unreal Engine. You can still create your game assets with blender and import them into Unreal Engine. For 2D game development, most of the engines out there use Box2D inc. Unity, Godot and Game Engine.

I mean... there is also Box2d... (https://box2d.org/) for 2d stuff as /u/Disembleergon mentioned.

My current personal project is a 2D editor for setting up Box2D contraptions. I'm writing this for the web, so the C++ is compiled to wasm and WebGL is used for drawing. I'm currently not doing a whole lot of interaction with OpenGL myself, but rather using NanoVG to get a higher level 2D drawing API.

As for physics there's tons of options, but the list gets rather exhaustive when considering 2D and 3D but you have box2d, bullet, and many many more.

It's called boxed, and it's open source. See for yourself https://box2d.org

Does anyone know what engine ProgressBar 95 uses? Because i think this engine might be cool to use! It's called Box2d, and it's a physics engine for games! If it's compatible with whatever engine ProgressBar 95 uses, maybe the devs can do some cool stuff! After all, The newton virus was made with this!