iceoryx VS ruby-dbus

Compare iceoryx vs ruby-dbus and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
iceoryx ruby-dbus
10 1
1,520 167
3.5% -
9.8 7.7
4 days ago 7 months ago
C++ Ruby
Apache License 2.0 GNU Lesser General Public License v3.0 only
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

iceoryx

Posts with mentions or reviews of iceoryx. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-13.

ruby-dbus

Posts with mentions or reviews of ruby-dbus. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects.
  • Personal Computing on an Amiga in 2021
    1 project | news.ycombinator.com | 8 Aug 2021
    above you have to be really dedicated to want to keep diving into it.

    > I wouldn't couple it to a specific language, and in fact I don't think that was the case with ARexx anyway: the interface was open enough that other scripting languages could have been supported on the existing ARexx infrastructure.

    The port/command execution is open enough, certainly. A good example would be FrexxEd (one of the co-authors was/is Daniel Stenberg of CURL fame), which used "FPL" (a C-like language) as its main scripting language, but all the editor specific commands are shared between FPL and the ARexx port.

    > I'm not going to do the work though ;-) Got enough going on ATM...

    This is the problem. So many of us miss parts of what the Amiga does, but they're conveniences that are easy to miss and want but hard to justify putting in the effort on. Especially as many of them are just sufficiently dated that they'd need some rethinking, and suddenly it's a lot of effort.

    [1] https://github.com/mvidner/ruby-dbus

What are some alternatives?

When comparing iceoryx and ruby-dbus you can also consider the following projects:

cyclonedds - Eclipse Cyclone DDS project

neovim-ruby - Ruby support for Neovim

eCAL - Please visit the new repository: https://github.com/eclipse-ecal/ecal

Aeron - Efficient reliable UDP unicast, UDP multicast, and IPC message transport

ecal - 📦 eCAL - enhanced Communication Abstraction Layer. A high performance publish-subscribe, client-server cross-plattform middleware.

curses - Ruby binding for curses, ncurses, and PDCurses. Formerly part of the ruby standard library.

alephzero

rb-libsvm - Ruby language bindings for LIBSVM

rmw_iceoryx - rmw implementation for iceoryx

areg-sdk - AREG is an asynchronous Object RPC framework to simplify multitasking programming by blurring borders between processes and treating remote objects as if they coexist in the same thread.

shadesmar - Fast C++ IPC using shared memory

sobjectizer - An implementation of Actor, Publish-Subscribe, and CSP models in one rather small C++ framework. With performance, quality, and stability proved by years in the production.