hush VS ngs

If we're detaching from POSIX, why not get more wild? Why not xonsh or something? Also I found this lua inspired shell which could be cool: https://github.com/hush-shell/hush

Maybe hush (https://github.com/hush-shell/hush) should be included in this list.

While being extremely small is a worthy goal, I suppose the aim of Hush is to make writing larger shell scripts easier and less error-prone. It's more for the niche of Perl of old than of minimal shells like ash.

For a very limited device, a very limited shell like that in Busybox is sufficient, because it likely does not need large shell scripts, or a lot of interactive work.

Looking at [1], current Hush is under 700k, which is still way smaller than Python or Perl, with much of its expressiveness.

[1]: https://github.com/hush-shell/hush/releases

Official guide: https://hush-shell.github.io/ Repository: https://github.com/hush-shell/hush

Yes, you can check the code here: https://github.com/gahag/hush

Next Generation Shell. As a shell, it's a programming language and a UI. Half baked: programming language - pretty much done, we use it at work; UI - just starting to work on.

Ananlysis of what's wrong with current shells' UIs and how to fix it - https://blog.ngs-lang.org/2023/09/30/ui-in-ngs/

Project - https://github.com/ngs-lang/ngs

Any help would be appreciated of course :)

The plan for UI is at https://github.com/ngs-lang/ngs/wiki/UI-Design

The site is at https://ngs-lang.org/

Project: https://github.com/ngs-lang/ngs

There are number of new ones coming out ...and I'm curious of https://github.com/ngs-lang/ngs. As a language nerd, have you seen that?

Thanks, took a note - https://github.com/ngs-lang/ngs/issues/621