hubris
rustc_codegen_gcc
Our great sponsors
hubris | rustc_codegen_gcc | |
---|---|---|
33 | 49 | |
2,790 | 874 | |
6.5% | 3.0% | |
9.4 | 9.7 | |
6 days ago | 4 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
Mozilla Public License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
hubris
-
Framework won't be just a laptop company anymore
> The CPUs in Oxide racks are AMD, so, presumably AMD-based compute rather than ARM.
These don’t run Hubris though; based on the chips directory in the repo [0], they’re targeting a mix of NXP and ST parts, which are Arm, and the user isn’t likely to see them or care what firmware they’re running: they’re really pretty “boring”.
[0] : https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris/tree/020d014880382d8...
-
Who killed the network switch? A Hubris Bug Story
I wouldn't put this comment here. It's not just some detail of this function; it's an invariant of the field that all writers have to respect (maybe this is the only one now but still) and all readers can take advantage of. So I'd add it to the `TaskDesc::regions` docstring. [1]
[1] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris/commit/b44e677fb39cd...
-
Oxide: The Cloud Computer
With respect to Hubris, the build badge was, in turns out, pointing to a stale workflow. (That is, the build was succeeding, but the build badge was busted.) This comment has been immortalized in the fix.[0]
With respect to Humility, I am going to resist the temptation of pointing out why one of those directories has a different nomenclature with respect to its delimiter -- and just leave it at this: if you really want to find some filthy code in Humility, you can do much, much better than that!
[0] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris/commit/651a9546b20ce...
-
Barracuda Urges Replacing – Not Patching – Its Email Security Gateways
A lot of questions in there! Taking these in order:
1. We aren't making standalone servers: the Oxide compute sled comes in the Oxide rack. So are not (and do not intend to be) a drop in replacement for extant rack mounted servers.
2. We have taken a fundamentally different approach to firmware, with a true root of trust that can attest to the service processor -- which can turn attest to the system software. This prompts a lot of questions (e.g., who attests to the root of trust?), and there is a LOT to say about this; look for us to talk a lot more about this
3. In stark contrast (sadly) to nearly everyone else in the server space, the firmware we are developing is entirely open source. More details on that can be found in Cliff Biffle's 2021 OSFC talk and the Hubris and Humility repos.[0][1][2]
4. Definitely not vaporware! We are in the process of shipping to our first customers; you can follow our progress in our Oxide and Friends podcast.[3]
[0] https://www.osfc.io/2021/talks/on-hubris-and-humility-develo...
[1] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris
[2] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/humility
[3] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/
- Do you use Rust in your professional career?
-
Spotting and Avoiding Heap Fragmentation in Rust Applications
everywhere, for example in https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris/search?q=dyn
Is Box really allocating here? Is the "Rust By Example" text incomplete?
Then I had to stop learning Rust for other reasons, but this doubt really hit me at the time.
-
What's the coolest thing you've done with Neovim?
I work on an embedded OS in Rust (Hubris) that has a very bespoke build system. As part of the build system, it has to set environmental variables based on (1) the target device and (2) the specific "task"; this is an OS with task-level isolation, so tasks are compiled as individual Rust crates.
-
TCG TPM2.0 implementations vulnerable to memory corruption
Oxide Computer told some storied about the difficulty of bring up of a new motherboard, and mentioned a lot of gotcha details and hack solutions for managing their AMD chip.
They talked about their bring up sequence, boot chain verification on their motherboard, and designing / creating / verifying their hardware root of trust.
I heard mention of this on a podcast recently, trying to find the reference.
I'm pretty sure it was [S3]
- "Tales from the Bringup Lab" https://lnns.co/FBf5oLpyHK3
- or "More Tales from the Bringup Lab" https://lnns.co/LQur_ToJX9m
But I found again these interesting things worth sharing on that search. https://oxide.computer/blog/hubris-and-humility, https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris
Search 1 [S1], Trammell Hudson ep mentioning firmware (chromebook related iirc) https://lnns.co/pystdPm0QvG.
Search 2 [S2], Security, Cryptography, Whatever podcast episode mentioning Oxide and roots of trust or similar. https://lnns.co/VnyTvdhBiGC
Search links:
[S1]: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=oxide+tpm
[S2]: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=oxide%20and%20friends%...
[S3]: https://www.listennotes.com/search/?q=oxide%20and%20friends%...
- Well-documented Embedded dev board for video, ethernet, usb, file IO, etc
-
OpenAI Used Kenyan Workers on Less Than $2 per Hour to Make ChatGPT Less Toxic
When we started the company, we knew it would be a three year build -- and indeed, our first product is in the final stages of development (i.e. EMC/safety certification). We have been very transparent about our progress along the way[0][1][2][3][4][5][6][7] -- and our software is essentially all open source, so you can follow along there as well.[8][9][10]
If you are asking "does anyone want a rack-scale computer?" the (short) answer is: yes, they do. The on-prem market has been woefully underserved -- and there are plenty of folks who are sick of Dell/HPE/VMware/Cisco, to say nothing of those who are public cloud borne and wondering if they should perhaps own some of their own compute rather than rent it all.
[0] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/holistic-bo...
[1] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/the-oxide-s...
[2] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/bringup-lab...
[3] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/more-tales-...
[4] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/another-lpc...
[5] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/the-pragmat...
[6] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/tales-from-...
[7] https://oxide-and-friends.transistor.fm/episodes/the-sidecar...
[8] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/omicron
[9] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/propolis
[10] https://github.com/oxidecomputer/hubris
rustc_codegen_gcc
-
How hard would it be to port the Rust toolchain to a new non-POSIX OS written in Rust and get it to host its own development? What would that process entail?
Alternatively, there's another initiative called codegen_gcc which is about using GCC as a backend for the rustc compiler. It's (much) more advanced in Rust support, but I am not sure how easy it would be to use a modified libgccjit from there.
-
"Rust makes me never want to touch C again" -- Matthew Ahrens
In addition to what others have said about platform support, Rust is also on its way to gaining more platform support through rustc_codegen_gcc, the GCC codegen backend for rustc, as an alternative to the LLVM backend. That means many of the platforms GCC supports will suddenly become available with Rust.
-
Rust contributions for Linux 6.4 are finally merged upstream!
Yeah, rustc_codegen_gcc is a GCC backend for rustc, and its making a lot of good regular progress.
-
GCC 13 and the State of Gccrs
gcc-rs is one of two projects for bringing Rust to gcc. gcc-rs is the more ambitious of the two, with an entirely new frontend. There is also rustc_codegen_gcc (https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc) that keeps the rustc frontend, and only swaps out LLVM for GCC at the codegen stage.
-
rustc_codegen_gcc: Progress Report #22
Fixing unwinding in release mode is still ungoing. I could use some help here, so anyone with some understanding of unwinding, landing pads or GCC, please come on this issue to discuss this.
-
Any alternate Rust compilers?
Additionally, there is gcc codegen for rustc (https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc), which is not a compiler per se, but an alternative code generator, with more architectures supported and other nice things. It's also coming along, but there's still a lot of work to do there too. There's also Cranelift codegen (https://github.com/bjorn3/rustc_codegen_cranelift), which is designed to make debug builds faster, but this is not as exciting/useful as the other 2.
-
rustc_codegen_gcc: Progress Report #21
Good idea. I added the tag "help wanted" to the issue.
-
Challenges writing a compiler frontend targeting both LLVM and GCC?
Also, there are indeed ABI issues, e.g. for 128-bit integers and NaN.
-
A brave new world: building glibc with LLVM
I'm excited about both the backend & the frontend.
-
Rust front-end merged in GCC trunk
There is also a project for rustc to use GCC instead of LLVM for codegen.
https://github.com/rust-lang/rustc_codegen_gcc
What are some alternatives?
tock - A secure embedded operating system for microcontrollers
gccrs - GCC Front-End for Rust
esp32 - Peripheral access crate for the ESP32
gcc-rust - a (WIP) Rust frontend for gcc / a gcc backend for rustc
meta-raspberrypi - Yocto/OE BSP layer for the Raspberry Pi boards
min-sized-rust - 🦀 How to minimize Rust binary size 📦
esp32-hal - A hardware abstraction layer for the esp32 written in Rust.
databend - 𝗗𝗮𝘁𝗮, 𝗔𝗻𝗮𝗹𝘆𝘁𝗶𝗰𝘀 & 𝗔𝗜. Modern alternative to Snowflake. Cost-effective and simple for massive-scale analytics. https://databend.com
l4v - seL4 specification and proofs
compiler-explorer - Run compilers interactively from your web browser and interact with the assembly
ferros - A Rust-based userland which also adds compile-time assurances to seL4 development.
libgccjit-patches - Patches awaiting review for libgccjit