grapl
cargo-crev
grapl | cargo-crev | |
---|---|---|
8 | 55 | |
671 | 2,034 | |
- | 1.7% | |
9.8 | 7.7 | |
over 1 year ago | 30 days ago | |
Rust | Rust | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
grapl
-
Rust – Faster compilation with the parallel front-end in nightly
https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl/
I just did a clean build `cargo build`, 19 minutes 44 seconds.
I added 1 line (`dbg!("foo")`) and it took 14.76s
-
Introduction to Curp Protocol
Awesome. So, CURP was pretty inspiring for the work I did on Grapl. Grapl Schemas had to define conflict resolution algorithms.
https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl/blob/main/etc/exampl...
As you can see here, there are some special built-ins that aren't important (keys, timestamps) but you can see there's @immutable (FWW) and @increment_only.
This meant that our graphs formed a big CRDT, which meant that every operation commuted, which meant that we could do weird things with our consensus. Reads could happen on stale data, writes could be dropped, we could read from two inconsistent databases and resolve the inconsistency in memory, etc. I even hacked this into ScyllaDB by encoding each merge function into an integer, and setting that as the TIMESTAMP, for when replication merging happened to the values - this meant we could perform writes (repeatedly) without reading a value first, and with no coordination between nodes. What I didn't have was a native solution that could take advantage of these constraints.
As you can tell, this project is obviously very interesting to me. I ran through this pretty quickly but I'll dig in more soon. I'm just excited to see this.
- Transitioning to Rust as a company
- Rust for cyber security
-
Why Rust is a great choice for startups
Rust, Python and Go. Props to you for being sensible with technology choice.
https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl
-
Is Rust Web Yet?
That's great for you and your team, but looking at https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl it seems like your needs are pretty different from most web developers.
- NPM malware and what it could imply for Cargo
cargo-crev
-
Hard disk LEDs and noisy machines
In other cases it may be more documented, such as Golangs baked-in telemetry.
There should be better ways to check these problems. The best I have found so far is Crev https://github.com/crev-dev/crev/. It's most used implementation is Cargo-crev https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev, but hopefully it will become more required to use these types of tools. Certainty and metrics about how many eyes have been on a particular script, and what expertise they have would be a huge win for software.
-
Rust Without Crates.io
The main problem the author is talking about is actually about version updates, which in Maven as well as crates.io is up to each lib's author, and is not curated in any way.
There's no technical solution to that, really. Do you think Nexus Firewall can pick up every exploit, or even most? How confident of that are you, and what data do you have to back that up? I don't have any myself, but would not be surprised at all if "hackers" can easily work around their scanning.
However, I don't have a better approach than using scanning tools like Nexus, or as the author proposes, use a curated library repository like Debian is doing (which hopefully gets enough eyeballs to remain secure) or the https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev project (manually reviewed code) also mentioned. It's interesting that they mention C/C++ just rely on distros providing dynamic libs instead which means you don't even control your dependencies versions, some distro does (how reliable is the distro?)... I wonder if that could work for other languages or if it's just as painful as it looks in the C world.
-
I don't care about cookies” extension bought by Avast, users jump ship
For instance, the worst company imaginable may be in charge of software that was once FOSS, and they may change absolutely nothing about it, so it should be fine. However, if a small update is added that does something bad, you should know about it immediately.
The solution seems to be much more clearly in the realm of things like crev: https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev/
Wherein users can get a clear picture of what dependencies are used in the full chain, and how they have been independently reviewed for security and privacy. That's the real solution for the future. A quick score that is available upon display everytime you upgrade, with large warnings for anything above a certain threshold.
-
I think there should be some type of crates vertification especially the popular ones?
The metrics on crates.io are a useful sniff test, but ultimately you need to review things yourself, or trust some contributors and reviewers. Some projects, like cargo crev or cargo vet can help with the process.
-
[Discussion] What crates would you like to see?
You can use cargo-geiger or cargo-crev to check for whether people you trusted (e.g. u/jonhoo ) trust this crate.
-
Pip and cargo are not the same
There is a similar idea being explored with https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev - you trust a reviewer who reviews crates for trustworthiness, as well as other reviewers.
- greater supply chain attack risk due to large dependency trees?
-
Why so many basic features are not part of the standard library?
[cargo-crev](https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev) looks like a good step in the right direction but not really commonly used.
-
“You meant to install ripgrep”
'cargo crev' makes this kind of workflow possible: https://github.com/crev-dev/cargo-crev
-
Difference between cargo-vet and cargo-crev?
The crev folks themselves are no fans of PGP but need a way to security identify that you are in fact the review author, so that's where the id generation comes in. Ultimately crev is just a bunch of repos with text files you sign with IDs. The nice property is that you can chain these together into a web of trust and it's unfortunate that vet doesn't just use the same signed files on repos model as a foundation because even if they don't trust anyone else, we could turn around and trust them.
What are some alternatives?
ntex - framework for composable networking services
crates.io - The Rust package registry
cargo-deny - ❌ Cargo plugin for linting your dependencies 🦀
stackage - Stable Haskell package sets: vetted consistent packages from Hackage
demo-rust-axum - Demo of Rust and axum web framework with Tokio, Tower, Hyper, Serde
crates.io-index - Registry index for crates.io
nodo - Pre-emptively created repository so the design can be discussed on the issue tracker before commits are made (repo name may change)
serde - Serialization framework for Rust
rfcs - RFCs for changes to Rust
cargo-msrv - 🦀 Find the minimum supported Rust version (MSRV) for your project
rust-wiki-backup - A backup of the Rust wiki
Rustup - The Rust toolchain installer