grapl VS areweguiyet

https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl/

I just did a clean build `cargo build`, 19 minutes 44 seconds.

I added 1 line (`dbg!("foo")`) and it took 14.76s

Awesome. So, CURP was pretty inspiring for the work I did on Grapl. Grapl Schemas had to define conflict resolution algorithms.

https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl/blob/main/etc/exampl...

As you can see here, there are some special built-ins that aren't important (keys, timestamps) but you can see there's @immutable (FWW) and @increment_only.

This meant that our graphs formed a big CRDT, which meant that every operation commuted, which meant that we could do weird things with our consensus. Reads could happen on stale data, writes could be dropped, we could read from two inconsistent databases and resolve the inconsistency in memory, etc. I even hacked this into ScyllaDB by encoding each merge function into an integer, and setting that as the TIMESTAMP, for when replication merging happened to the values - this meant we could perform writes (repeatedly) without reading a value first, and with no coordination between nodes. What I didn't have was a native solution that could take advantage of these constraints.

As you can tell, this project is obviously very interesting to me. I ran through this pretty quickly but I'll dig in more soon. I'm just excited to see this.

Rust, Python and Go. Props to you for being sensible with technology choice.

https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl

That's great for you and your team, but looking at https://github.com/grapl-security/grapl it seems like your needs are pretty different from most web developers.

The organization behind QT (QT Group) has pretty onerous licensing terms.

My understanding is that it's $3,950 per year just to develop using their libraries on your own computer if you ever in the future intend to commercialize a product using QT. Transitioning from the open source license to the commercial license is something you can do but it's not the happy path and their FAQ seems to indicate that it comes with some sort of penalty.

https://www.qt.io/pricing

Something like Slint (Rust based but includes CPP and JS bindings) is not as comprehensive (yet) but it's more modern and the licensing terms are significantly more in line with software industry norms.

GPUI from Zed is also something to monitor: https://www.gpui.rs/

Also, in general you can find an extensive list of Rust-based native UI libraries here: https://areweguiyet.com/

I would suggest that nearly every person on this website is a developer. Both C and C++ let you shoot yourself in the foot quite easily, but at least C++ has RAII.

If you're referring to Rust, it's just not there yet for anything serious: https://areweguiyet.com/

I normally use python to do some quick data analysis, with pandas/polars/pyspark/...

But I've started to use rust more and more in the last few weeks and really start to like it.

Does anyone have experience doing data analysis with rust, and would you recommend it over python?

And are there any resources like https://areweguiyet.com/ but for data analysis?

You still haven't said anything about why those existing frameworks don't count. Again, they are used in production and do exactly what a gui framework is supposed to do. Sure they may not have all the features of the frameworks that have existed a decade before rust even existed but the issue is time not rust itself. They very clearly can be used to build complex UI without inheritance. Since you mentioned it, you should probably actually look at it https://areweguiyet.com/ the page clearly says that GUI frameworks do exist in rust.

The web site https://areweguiyet.com/ has a list of GUI libraries for Rust.

I haven’t tried any yet as I lack the time, but it can be a good starting point.

Iced and Slint where interesting when I looked at that, and Slint may be done by former Qt developers.

I also hope that it is consistent with the goals mentioned at https://areweguiyet.com/