faust
Rack
Our great sponsors
faust | Rack | |
---|---|---|
54 | 156 | |
2,403 | 3,965 | |
1.5% | 0.5% | |
9.6 | 8.6 | |
7 days ago | 9 days ago | |
C++ | C++ | |
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later | GNU General Public License v3.0 or later |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
faust
-
My Sixth Year as a Bootstrapped Founder
Glicol looks very cool! Also check out Faust if you haven't (https://faust.grame.fr), another FP sound programming language.
-
Welcome to the Chata Programming Language
The linked (https://github.com/grame-cncm/faust) looks reasonable to me.
Chata probably needs to work out roughly what the semantics of the language should be. Its good to know what the library support is intended to be as that informs language design (assuming the library is to be implemented in chata anyway). Quite a lot of this page is about syntax.
There are some design decisions that have deep impact on programming languages. Reflection, mutation, memory management, control flow, concurrency. There are some implementation choices that end up constraining the language spec - python seems full of these.
Echoing p4bl0, implementing the language will change the spec. Writing a spec up front might be an interesting exercise anyway. I'd encourage doing both at the same time - sometimes describe what a feature should be and then implement it, sometimes implement something as best you can and then describe what you've got.
Implementation language will affect how long it takes to get something working, how good the thing will be and what you'll think about along the way. The usual guidance is to write in something familiar to you, ideally with pattern matching as compilers do a lot of DAG transforms.
- I'd say that writing a language in C took me ages and forced me to really carefully think through the data representation.
- Writing one in lua took very little time but the implementation was shaky, probably because it let me handwave a lot of the details.
- Writing a language in itself, from a baseline of not really having anything working, makes for very confusing debugging and (eventually) a totally clear understanding of the language semantics.
Good luck with the project.
- Faust: A functional programming language for audio synthesis and processing
-
Live + Python = ❤️
Faust integration would be awesome: https://faust.grame.fr Then again we have MaxMSP, so in the end it feels kind of redundant
- Glicol: Next-generation computer music language
-
Csound
Csound is extremely powerful, but my favorite thing in this vein these days is Faust:
https://faust.grame.fr/
It's a functional language with a nice way of generating diagrams of DSP algorithms, but its big killer feature for me is its language bindings, which include C, C++, Cmajor, Codebox, CSharp, DLang, Java, JAX, Julia, JSFX, "old" C++, Rust, VHDL, and WebAssembly (wast/wasm) out of the box.
-
faust VS midica - a user suggested alternative
2 projects | 12 Aug 2023
-
Libraries / frameworks / tooling for cross-platform (LV2/VST3) C++ plug-ins (open-source)
Have a look at FAUST as well: https://faust.grame.fr/
-
logueSDK for beginners
Once you have an idea of basic programming practice, you need to learn some DSP programming. One of the better tools for this is Faust https://faust.grame.fr/ , bear in mind this is a functional programming language, and has very different syntax to C++, but the same principles apply.
- Where is a good place to get started with DSP coding?
Rack
- VCV Rack – The Eurorack Simulator
- Ambient improvisation with DIY modular synth and electric guitar
-
Would you guys recommend buying Nexus for a beginner
VCV Rack - Modular Synth
-
Ask HN: Comment here about whatever you're passionate about at the moment
> It’s haven’t bought any Modular’s yet but I’m really looking forward to getting into other on the new year.
http://cardinal.kx.studio
https://vcvrack.com/
The former is libre and gratis, runs as a standalone or plugin and in the browser!! and is based on the latter.
Ther former has a libre and gratis standalone version, the plugin version is non-gratis.
-
Ask HN: Whats the modern day equivalent of 80s computer for kids to explore?
A music synthesizer. It's a pathway to learning electronics, music, and the nature of sound. There are cheap kits, cheap synths, lots of kinds of synths, and there are much more complicated and expensive systems you can grow into. You can get software synths also, VCV Rack is a free though complex one:
https://vcvrack.com/
However I'd recommend an inexpensive hardware one with real knobs you can turn, like one of the Korg Volca series:
https://www.korg-volca.com/en/
Recording the sounds can lead into exploring all the concepts and gear involved in recording and mixing music. It's not mutually exclusive with doing other things also, you can play with both synths and computers and being involved with something artistic can add dimensions to and an escape from the nature of classwork/work.
Some other suggestions: gardening, high voltage electronics (with lots of supervision), electronics, photography, movie making, ham radio (gnu radio), show lighting systems (there's more than disco lights, robotics is involved), robotics, acoustic instruments (guitar, piano, flute, drums), sensors (you don't necessarily have to know electronics, get a data logger with built in sensors), weather monitoring/forecasting, hydraulic systems (with supervision), wood working, metal working, 3D printing, bird watching, painting, minibikes/small engines.
- What Is the Future of the DAW?
- Good eurorack learning resources for a complete beginner?
-
I love synthesizers, but I suck at synthesis and sound design?
What really opened my eyes was the Nord Micromodular; it taught me what I just described. It showed me how limited other synths were - but that limitation was a trade-off because it's much faster to make something on a fixed-structure synth than on a modular, in most cases. Nowadays, you can use https://vcvrack.com/ instead of a small limited box that needs Windows 98 to run the editor on.
- Should I pull the trigger?
-
Long time Cubase user who is leaving a more traditional electronic workflow to modular hardware... Bitwig seems to be the DAW more for this style possibly? Any opinions first hand?
Also I would suggest the paid version of VCV rack which works as a VST too ( the free version is just stand alone ) Expecially when experimenting with modular ( believe me, it can save you a fortune whilst you learn what different modules do ) I would also recommend Omri Cohens Youtube channel for learning this too.
What are some alternatives?
supercollider - An audio server, programming language, and IDE for sound synthesis and algorithmic composition.
Cardinal - Virtual modular synthesizer plugin
csound - Main repository for Csound
BespokeSynth - Software modular synth
SOUL - The SOUL programming language and API
BespokeSynth - Software modular synth [Moved to: https://github.com/BespokeSynth/BespokeSynth]
yummyDSP - An Arduino audio DSP library for the Espressif ESP32 and probably other 32 bit machines
zynthian-sys - System configuration scripts & files for Zynthian.
curriculum - The open curriculum for learning web development
Enzyme - High-performance automatic differentiation of LLVM and MLIR.
DaisySP - A Powerful DSP Library in C++