glam-rs VS cargo-rx

You could consider using a template framework instead, like Tera. Glam actually does this to generate Rust code.

If you’re still concerned, we can look at the implementation for to_euler()

I've been polishing glamour, the strongly typed vector math companion to glam. :-)

This crate uses bytemuck to implement a zero-cost strongly typed interface on top of glam.

GitHub | crates.io | Release notes

Very cool. I'm looking for a spell checking or auto correction hint support for a fuzzy finder project I've currently been building out. I just created an issue under the project as I was inspired in part by supporting such a feature; I do think it would be cool to add auto completion or suggestion hints mainly for CLI utilities, at least ones where it makes sense to have it certainly. I like that cargo run already has built in support for this, and I agree it would be cool for other projects to adopt such functionality, assuming it proves to be feasible enough.

I'm working on releasing the next minor release of my project cargo-rx, which should hopefully be wrapped up by tomorrow at the latest. It basically employs a fuzzy finder approach - thanks to skim - to make it easier to run examples in Cargo projects.

I've been working on releasing the next minor version update for my crate cargo-rx, which is a wrapper around cargo run --example. On Mac/Linux, it serves a fuzzy finder which leverages skim to sort and search for examples to run within a specific crate.

Hi there, fellow Rustaceans! I'm very pleased to announce the initial v0.1.0 release of cargo-rx, a simple, modern example runner for Cargo projects. It provides a single executable rx which abstracts away cargo run --example, and provides a fuzzy finder to search for an example to run.