flatpak-cve-checker VS nix-gui

Compare flatpak-cve-checker vs nix-gui and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
flatpak-cve-checker nix-gui
2 29
2 638
- 0.0%
10.0 0.0
over 5 years ago over 1 year ago
Python Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 only MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

flatpak-cve-checker

Posts with mentions or reviews of flatpak-cve-checker. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-23.
  • Update from the world of Fedora Workstation
    1 project | /r/linux | 15 Dec 2022
    Parsing the manifest for vulns is doable. Here I wrote one: https://github.com/TingPing/flatpak-cve-checker
  • Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Nov 2021
    If Debian (or whatever org/group/project/initiative that) provides the images has a security policy, they can extend that to the images too.

    Users don't run CVE checkers [0], at best they reluctantly click on the update button. Of course the authoritarian evergreen auto-update thing is what actually works in practice.

    For example as much as snap's UX sucks it does auto update by default.

    [0] Though they could, as files in container images are trivially accessible, after all it's their purpose. Plus there are metadata based approaches: https://github.com/TingPing/flatpak-cve-checker (plus the Flatpak project already spends some energy on ensuring that the base image is chechekd against CVEs https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/freedesktop-sdk/-/jobs/18... ) of course duplicating this effort, and building a parallel world besides packages is not ideal, but

nix-gui

Posts with mentions or reviews of nix-gui. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-08-03.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing flatpak-cve-checker and nix-gui you can also consider the following projects:

us.zoom.Zoom

flatpak - Linux application sandboxing and distribution framework

xdg-desktop-portal-gtk - Gtk implementation of xdg-desktop-portal

freedesktop-sdk

nixos-hardware - A collection of NixOS modules covering hardware quirks.

org.signal.Signal

dhall-lang - Maintainable configuration files

mpz - Music player for big local collections

nonguix - Nonguix mirror – pull requests ignored, please use upstream for that

nix-bundle - Bundle Nix derivations to run anywhere!

nickel - Better configuration for less