flatpak-cve-checker VS org.signal.Signal

Compare flatpak-cve-checker vs org.signal.Signal and see what are their differences.

InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
flatpak-cve-checker org.signal.Signal
2 40
2 59
- -
10.0 8.3
over 5 years ago 7 days ago
Python Shell
GNU General Public License v3.0 only -
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

flatpak-cve-checker

Posts with mentions or reviews of flatpak-cve-checker. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-23.
  • Update from the world of Fedora Workstation
    1 project | /r/linux | 15 Dec 2022
    Parsing the manifest for vulns is doable. Here I wrote one: https://github.com/TingPing/flatpak-cve-checker
  • Flaptak (and Snap) is not the future
    10 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 23 Nov 2021
    If Debian (or whatever org/group/project/initiative that) provides the images has a security policy, they can extend that to the images too.

    Users don't run CVE checkers [0], at best they reluctantly click on the update button. Of course the authoritarian evergreen auto-update thing is what actually works in practice.

    For example as much as snap's UX sucks it does auto update by default.

    [0] Though they could, as files in container images are trivially accessible, after all it's their purpose. Plus there are metadata based approaches: https://github.com/TingPing/flatpak-cve-checker (plus the Flatpak project already spends some energy on ensuring that the base image is chechekd against CVEs https://gitlab.com/freedesktop-sdk/freedesktop-sdk/-/jobs/18... ) of course duplicating this effort, and building a parallel world besides packages is not ideal, but

org.signal.Signal

Posts with mentions or reviews of org.signal.Signal. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-07.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing flatpak-cve-checker and org.signal.Signal you can also consider the following projects:

us.zoom.Zoom

xdg-desktop-portal-gtk - Gtk implementation of xdg-desktop-portal

axolotl - A Signal compatible cross plattform client written in Go, Rust and Vuejs

freedesktop-sdk

Signal-Android - Patches to Signal for Android removing dependencies on closed-source Google Mobile Services and Firebase libraries. In branches whose names include "-FOSS". Uses new "foss" or "gms" flavor dimension: build with "./gradlew assemblePlayFossProdRelease".

mpz - Music player for big local collections

nix-gui - Use NixOS Without Coding

nheko - Desktop client for Matrix using Qt and C++20.

nix-bundle - Bundle Nix derivations to run anywhere!

LibreSignal - LibreSignal • The truly private and Google-Free messenger for Android.