flashtext
guidance
flashtext | guidance | |
---|---|---|
8 | 23 | |
5,535 | 17,357 | |
- | 2.7% | |
0.0 | 9.8 | |
6 months ago | 5 days ago | |
Python | Jupyter Notebook | |
MIT License | MIT License |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
flashtext
-
Show HN: LLMs can generate valid JSON 100% of the time
I have some other comment on this thread where I point out why I don’t think it’s superficial. Would love to get your feedback on that if you feel like spending more time on this thread.
But it’s not obscure? FlashText was a somewhat popular paper at the time (2017) with a popular repo (https://github.com/vi3k6i5/flashtext). Their paper was pretty derivative of Aho-Corasick, which they cited. If you think they genuinely fucked up, leave an issue on their repo (I’m, maybe to your surprise lol, not the author).
Anyway, I’m not a fan of the whatabboutery here. I don’t think OG’s paper is up to snuff on its lit review - do you?
-
[P] what is the most efficient way to pattern matching word-to-word?
The library flashtext basically creates these tries based on keywords you give it.
-
What is the most efficient way to find substrings in strings?
Seems like https://github.com/vi3k6i5/flashtext would be better suited here.
-
[P] Library for end-to-end neural search pipelines
I started developing this tool after using haystack. Pipelines are easier to build with cherche because of the operators. Also, cherche offers FlashText, Lunr.py retrievers that are not available in Haystack and that I needed for the project I wanted to solve. Haystack is clearly more complete but I think also more complex to use.
-
How can I speed up thousands of re.subs()?
For the text part not requiring regex, https://github.com/vi3k6i5/flashtext might help
-
My first NLP pipeline using SpaCy: detect news headlines with company acquisitions
Spacy for parsing the Headlines, remove stop words etc. might be ok but I think the problem is quite narrow so a set of fixed regex searches might work quite well. If regex is too slow, try: https://github.com/vi3k6i5/flashtext
-
What tech do I need to learn to programmatically parse ingredients from a recipe?
I would probably use something like [flashtext](https://github.com/vi3k6i5/flashtext) which should not be too hard to port to kotlin.
- Quickest way to check that 14000 strings arent in An original string.
guidance
-
Anthropic's Haiku Beats GPT-4 Turbo in Tool Use
[1]: https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance/tree/main
-
Show HN: Prompts as (WASM) Programs
> The most obvious usage of this is forcing a model to output valid JSON
Isn't this something that Outlines [0], Guidance [1] and others [2] already solve much more elegantly?
0. https://github.com/outlines-dev/outlines
1. https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance
2. https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang
- Show HN: Fructose, LLM calls as strongly typed functions
-
LiteLlama-460M-1T has 460M parameters trained with 1T tokens
Or combine it with something like llama.cpp's grammer or microsoft's guidance-ai[0] (which I prefer) which would allow adding some react-style prompting and external tools. As others have mentioned, instruct tuning would help too.
[0] https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance
- Forcing AI to Follow a Specific Answer Pattern Using GBNF Grammar
-
Prompting LLMs to constrain output
have been experimenting with guidance and lmql. a bit too early to give any well formed opinions but really do like the idea of constraining llm output.
- Guidance is back 🥳
- New: LangChain templates – fastest way to build a production-ready LLM app
-
Is supervised learning dead for computer vision?
Thanks for your comment.
I did not know about "Betteridge's law of headlines", quite interesting. Thanks for sharing :)
You raise some interesting points.
1) Safety: It is true that LVMs and LLMs have unknown biases and could potentially create unsafe content. However, this is not necessarily unique to them, for example, Google had the same problem with their supervised learning model https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/12/16882408/google-racist-go.... It all depends on the original data. I believe we need systems on top of our models to ensure safety. It is also possible to restrict the output domain of our models (https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance). Instead of allowing our LVMs to output any words, we could restrict it to only being able to answer "red, green, blue..." when giving the color of a car.
2) Cost: You are right right now LVMs are quite expensive to run. As you said are a great way to go to market faster but they cannot run on low-cost hardware for the moment. However, they could help with training those smaller models. Indeed, with see in the NLP domain that a lot of smaller models are trained on data created with GPT models. You can still distill the knowledge of your LVMs into a custom smaller model that can run on embedded devices. The advantage is that you can use your LVMs to generate data when it is scarce and use it as a fallback when your smaller device is uncertain of the answer.
3) Labelling data: I don't think labeling data is necessarily cheap. First, you have to collect the data, depending on the frequency of your events could take months of monitoring if you want to build a large-scale dataset. Lastly, not all labeling is necessarily cheap. I worked at a semiconductor company and labeled data was scarce as it required expert knowledge and could only be done by experienced employees. Indeed not all labelling can be done externally.
However, both approaches are indeed complementary and I think systems that will work the best will rely on both.
Thanks again for the thought-provoking discussion. I hope this answer some of the concerns you raised
-
Show HN: Elelem – TypeScript LLMs with tracing, retries, and type safety
I've had a bit of trouble getting function calling to work with cases that aren't just extracting some data from the input. The format is correct but it was harder to get the correct data if it wasn't a simple extraction.
Hopefully OpenAI and others will offer something like https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance at some point to guarantee overall output structure.
Failed validations will retry, but from what I've seen JSONSchema + generated JSON examples are decently reliable in practice for gpt-3.5-turbo and extremely reliable on gpt-4.
What are some alternatives?
KeyBERT - Minimal keyword extraction with BERT
lmql - A language for constraint-guided and efficient LLM programming.
rake-nltk - Python implementation of the Rapid Automatic Keyword Extraction algorithm using NLTK.
semantic-kernel - Integrate cutting-edge LLM technology quickly and easily into your apps
magnitude - A fast, efficient universal vector embedding utility package.
langchain - 🦜🔗 Build context-aware reasoning applications
Optimus - :truck: Agile Data Preparation Workflows made easy with Pandas, Dask, cuDF, Dask-cuDF, Vaex and PySpark
NeMo-Guardrails - NeMo Guardrails is an open-source toolkit for easily adding programmable guardrails to LLM-based conversational systems.
yake - Single-document unsupervised keyword extraction
text-generation-webui - A Gradio web UI for Large Language Models. Supports transformers, GPTQ, AWQ, EXL2, llama.cpp (GGUF), Llama models.
gensim - Topic Modelling for Humans
outlines - Structured Text Generation