The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning. Learn more →
Guidance Alternatives
Similar projects and alternatives to guidance
-
-
InfluxDB
Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale. Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
-
-
-
-
autogen
A programming framework for agentic AI. Discord: https://aka.ms/autogen-dc. Roadmap: https://aka.ms/autogen-roadmap
-
WorkOS
The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS. The APIs are flexible and easy-to-use, supporting authentication, user identity, and complex enterprise features like SSO and SCIM provisioning.
-
-
-
-
NeMo-Guardrails
NeMo Guardrails is an open-source toolkit for easily adding programmable guardrails to LLM-based conversational systems.
-
Segment-Everything-Everywhere-All-At-Once
[NeurIPS 2023] Official implementation of the paper "Segment Everything Everywhere All at Once"
-
-
-
text-generation-webui
A Gradio web UI for Large Language Models. Supports transformers, GPTQ, AWQ, EXL2, llama.cpp (GGUF), Llama models.
-
SaaSHub
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews. SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
NOTE:
The number of mentions on this list indicates mentions on common posts plus user suggested alternatives.
Hence, a higher number means a better guidance alternative or higher similarity.
guidance reviews and mentions
Posts with mentions or reviews of guidance.
We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives
and similar projects. The last one was on 2024-04-08.
-
Anthropic's Haiku Beats GPT-4 Turbo in Tool Use
[1]: https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance/tree/main
-
Show HN: Prompts as (WASM) Programs
> The most obvious usage of this is forcing a model to output valid JSON
Isn't this something that Outlines [0], Guidance [1] and others [2] already solve much more elegantly?
0. https://github.com/outlines-dev/outlines
1. https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance
2. https://github.com/sgl-project/sglang
- Show HN: Fructose, LLM calls as strongly typed functions
-
LiteLlama-460M-1T has 460M parameters trained with 1T tokens
Or combine it with something like llama.cpp's grammer or microsoft's guidance-ai[0] (which I prefer) which would allow adding some react-style prompting and external tools. As others have mentioned, instruct tuning would help too.
[0] https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance
- Forcing AI to Follow a Specific Answer Pattern Using GBNF Grammar
-
Prompting LLMs to constrain output
have been experimenting with guidance and lmql. a bit too early to give any well formed opinions but really do like the idea of constraining llm output.
- Guidance is back 🥳
- New: LangChain templates – fastest way to build a production-ready LLM app
-
Is supervised learning dead for computer vision?
Thanks for your comment.
I did not know about "Betteridge's law of headlines", quite interesting. Thanks for sharing :)
You raise some interesting points.
1) Safety: It is true that LVMs and LLMs have unknown biases and could potentially create unsafe content. However, this is not necessarily unique to them, for example, Google had the same problem with their supervised learning model https://www.theverge.com/2018/1/12/16882408/google-racist-go.... It all depends on the original data. I believe we need systems on top of our models to ensure safety. It is also possible to restrict the output domain of our models (https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance). Instead of allowing our LVMs to output any words, we could restrict it to only being able to answer "red, green, blue..." when giving the color of a car.
2) Cost: You are right right now LVMs are quite expensive to run. As you said are a great way to go to market faster but they cannot run on low-cost hardware for the moment. However, they could help with training those smaller models. Indeed, with see in the NLP domain that a lot of smaller models are trained on data created with GPT models. You can still distill the knowledge of your LVMs into a custom smaller model that can run on embedded devices. The advantage is that you can use your LVMs to generate data when it is scarce and use it as a fallback when your smaller device is uncertain of the answer.
3) Labelling data: I don't think labeling data is necessarily cheap. First, you have to collect the data, depending on the frequency of your events could take months of monitoring if you want to build a large-scale dataset. Lastly, not all labeling is necessarily cheap. I worked at a semiconductor company and labeled data was scarce as it required expert knowledge and could only be done by experienced employees. Indeed not all labelling can be done externally.
However, both approaches are indeed complementary and I think systems that will work the best will rely on both.
Thanks again for the thought-provoking discussion. I hope this answer some of the concerns you raised
-
Show HN: Elelem – TypeScript LLMs with tracing, retries, and type safety
I've had a bit of trouble getting function calling to work with cases that aren't just extracting some data from the input. The format is correct but it was harder to get the correct data if it wasn't a simple extraction.
Hopefully OpenAI and others will offer something like https://github.com/guidance-ai/guidance at some point to guarantee overall output structure.
Failed validations will retry, but from what I've seen JSONSchema + generated JSON examples are decently reliable in practice for gpt-3.5-turbo and extremely reliable on gpt-4.
-
A note from our sponsor - WorkOS
workos.com | 25 Apr 2024
Stats
Basic guidance repo stats
23
17,246
9.8
3 days ago
guidance-ai/guidance is an open source project licensed under MIT License which is an OSI approved license.
The primary programming language of guidance is Jupyter Notebook.
Sponsored
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com