embedded-graphics VS sd

Even if one used embedded-graphics, which would't require a line buffer, 8k is probably not enough RAM for the stack of a non-trivial Rust program. At least my even fairly simple RTIC programs that run fine in the 160k of a Feather M4 do not run at all in the 32k of a Feather M0.

I rewrote the font subsystem of U8g2 in pure Rust, introducing a large number of fonts to embedded-graphics.

Another project I've used is embedded-graphics which is useful if your target has more limited resources: https://github.com/embedded-graphics/embedded-graphics

We use it a bit for https://github.com/embedded-graphics/embedded-graphics and I have to say I love it. It's just the right balance between configuration variables/constants and "a folder full of bash scripts". I highly recommend giving Just a try.

View on GitHub

I wanted to like sd but it doesn't support my main use case of recursive search/replace. Imagine every time you wanted to grep some files you had to build a find+xargs+rg pipeline... it just takes me out of the flow too much. I'm glad people are posting other options here, I'm looking forward to trying them.

https://github.com/chmln/sd/issues/62

sd

https://github.com/chmln/sd ftw (sed rebuilt in rust, much easier imho) ;-)

sd is a more intuitive alternative to sed, focussing on making find and replace easier - which is all I ever used sed for.

https://github.com/chmln/sd

If it's in multiple files? To be honest, I'd just use a terminal and sed (or sd if you want something with a more friendly interface).

I love the idea and I'll try it out, but a heads up in case the author is around: the name sd clashes with another tool [0], which works as an alternative to sed.

I use that one pretty often, so maybe my first managed script will be one which symlinks binaries :)

[0] https://github.com/chmln/sd

sd is a find-and-replace CLI, and you can use it as a replacement for sed and awk. It is way more user-friendly and modern. It is also magnitudes faster than sed.