dotfiles.cli VS thefuck

I use about 12 plugins, most of which I've written myself.

bindkey -v is a builtin starting place, but there's a lot of extra bindings you can add to make it more like Vim. Personally, I've written a few plugins which make up the difference I want, and a few more personal bindings besides.

Here's my script. It forks off a playerctl --follow with a custom format to work around read skipping empty items (like a song without an artist). You don't have to do that, I just prefer that so I can add nwg-wrapper to view album art and song title on my desktop without spinning up another playerctl read loop.

Any config I write, I add to my dotfiles repo. Then I can clone it down whenever I'm setting up a new machine/reinstall

I wrote this script to run an arbitrary command when the provided app's window appears.

I'm curious; are you writing something like this?

Custom Powerlevel10k

Watch out for < and > too. Playerctl's command-line has specifiers for {{markup_escape(title)}}, I use it my playerctl segment. Here's how it looks with the custom CSS.

My full config is here, if you want to take a look at anything else, including the plugins I use.

There's also d and D which map to this function.

Are you by chance interested in a command named after the four-letter word, which automatically fixes and reruns the last command: https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck

With a good terminal, you can work 2-4 times faster. This will save time and reduced your errors. You can also use fuck (just like how you swear most of the time) to correct errors easily.

Now I want a thefuck implementation via uncensored LLMs.

>spellcheck on commands

I prefer to just type "fuck":

https://github.com/nvbn/thefuck

I am starting to learn Rust and I am starting to implement the fuck CLI tool in Rust. Do you think this is a good use of my learning time?