docker-socket-proxy VS wireguard-install

I just found this the other day. You might be interested I haven't done myself yet https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy

I think you could provide access to the socket using a "docker-socket-proxy" container. It allows other containers to access the docker socket, you can even control which actions are allowed and which are not. You can use a bridge network for the communication to the socket-proxy container, so the socket-proxy container does not need to map/expose any ports. In the other container you need to set the "DOCKER_HOST" env variable accordingly, e.g. "DOCKER_HOST=tcp://mydockersockerproxycontainer:2375". https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy

I use the container docker socket proxy

There are Docker socket proxys (like docker-socket-proxy 😉) that are made exactly for this. You can pass only read access to the socket and even restrict what resources can be read.

So far I have Traefik set up and tested (along with some security lockdowns https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy). This is working well: I can manually create containers, get a cert, dynamic hostnames, etc.

May be not necessarily: https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy

Many of you might already be familiar with Tecnativa's docker-socket-proxy which says:

version: "3.7" services: traefik: image: traefik:v2.6 command: # Entrypoints configuration - --entrypoints.web.address=:80 # Docker provider configuration - --providers.docker=true # Makes sure that services have to explicitly direct Traefik to expose them - --providers.docker.exposedbydefault=false # Use the secure docker socket proxy - --providers.docker.endpoint=tcp://socket_proxy:2375 # Default docker network to use for connections to all containers - --providers.docker.network=traefik_public # Logging levels are DEBUG, PANIC, FATAL, ERROR, WARN, and INFO. - --log.level=info ports: - 80:80 networks: - traefik_public - socket_proxy restart: unless-stopped depends_on: - socket_proxy # https://github.com/traefik/whoami whoami: image: traefik/whoami:v1.7.1 labels: # Explicitly instruct Traefik to expose this service - traefik.enable=true # Router configuration ## Listen to the `web` entrypoint - traefik.http.routers.whoami_route.entrypoints=web ## Rule based on the Host of the request - traefik.http.routers.whoami_route.rule=Host(`whoami.karvounis.tutorial`) - traefik.http.routers.whoami_route.service=whoami_service # Service configuration ## 80 is the port that the whoami container is listening to - traefik.http.services.whoami_service.loadbalancer.server.port=80 networks: - traefik_public # https://github.com/Tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy # Security-enhanced proxy for the Docker Socket socket_proxy: image: tecnativa/docker-socket-proxy:latest restart: unless-stopped environment: NETWORKS: 1 SERVICES: 1 CONTAINERS: 1 TASKS: 1 volumes: - /var/run/docker.sock:/var/run/docker.sock:ro networks: - socket_proxy networks: traefik_public: external: true socket_proxy: external: true

after that u can simply run this script https://github.com/Nyr/wireguard-install that helps you automatically install wireguard and create a config ( to add more configs just run it again ). This script also generates QR code that you can simply scan by ur phone

I currently have WG set up on a Linode Ubuntu server (installed from https://github.com/Nyr/wireguard-install) with Pihole setup in the background. I have everything working just fine, except for some websites showing as "Page cannot be displayed". I've looked up in the subreddit and some have recommended changing the MTU (which I've tried on server/client), but that doesn't resolve the issue. In Pihole, it shows that it responds correctly. I did enable IPv6, but this happened before adding IPv6. Running curl from SSH to access the affected site, it tells me 301 Site moved permanently. Here's the server config:

https://github.com/Nyr/wireguard-install

As for the VPN: I always use this installer on a raspy pi (you can do this on a virtual machine): https://github.com/Nyr/wireguard-install But that is only because I hate having to set up keys.

So I got a Libre AML-S905X-CC (Le Potato) to play around with but all the ideas I see online are about emulating games, running a nas, running ad blocker, vpn server, 3d printer, website hosting. All these just seem like these would be better to run on an actual server or the ideas are lame, basic, and overused. I just want some useful things that only these single board computers can do to justify their purpose. I like stuff like the PiKVM or wireless usb like VirtualHere. The Arduino has their spot for robotics and what not, but what do SBC have to offer besides being small and broad purpose? Stuff like can I make it auto start my car in the morning, attached it to a pcie port on my pc, make a cellular wifi hotspot modem thing, make a smart tv, make a robot with AI, bypass wifi router settings, make a smart door deadbolt or smart window blinds, AI caht bots, transmit landline calls to the internet, drones with facial recognition, spy balloons, kiss under the bicycle racks in walmart, watch the rat movie that cooks food, ratatoot toot, overthrow the government? Those types of ideas are stuff I see as useful but also I want to look up later if those are something that exists already.