cunumeric
cudf
cunumeric | cudf | |
---|---|---|
9 | 23 | |
595 | 7,291 | |
0.0% | 1.8% | |
8.5 | 9.9 | |
1 day ago | 2 days ago | |
Python | C++ | |
Apache License 2.0 | Apache License 2.0 |
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.
cunumeric
- Announcing Chapel 1.32
-
Is Parallel Programming Hard, and, If So, What Can You Do About It? [pdf]
I am biased because this is my research area, but I have to respectfully disagree. Actor models are awful, and the only reason it's not obvious is because everything else is even more awful.
But if you look at e.g., the recent work on task-based models, you'll see that you can have literally sequential programs that parallelize automatically. No message passing, no synchronization, no data races, no deadlocks. Read your programs as if they're sequential, and you immediately understand their semantics. Some of these systems are able to scale to thousands of nodes.
An interesting example of this is cuNumeric, which allows you to take sequential Python programs that use NumPy, and by changing one line (the import statement), run automatically on clusters of GPUs. It is 100% pure awesomeness.
https://github.com/nv-legate/cunumeric
(I don't work on cuNumeric, but I do work on the runtime framework that cuNumeric uses.)
-
GPT in 60 Lines of NumPy
I know this probably isn't intended for performance, but it would be fun to run this in cuNumeric [1] and see how it scales.
[1]: https://github.com/nv-legate/cunumeric
-
Dask – a flexible library for parallel computing in Python
If you want built-in GPU support (and distributed), you should check out cuNumeric (released by NVIDIA in the last week or so). Also avoids needing to manually specify chunk sizes, like it says in a sibling comment.
https://github.com/nv-legate/cunumeric
-
Julia is the better language for extending Python
Try dask
Distribute your data and run everything as dask.delayed and then compute only at the end.
Also check out legate.numpy from Nvidia which promises to be a drop in numpy replacement that will use all your CPU cores without any tweaks on your part.
https://github.com/nv-legate/legate.numpy
-
Learning more about HPC as a python guy
Something for the HPC tools category: https://github.com/nv-legate/legate.numpy
-
Unifying the CUDA Python Ecosystem
You might be interested in Legate [1]. It supports the NumPy interface as a drop-in replacement, supports GPUs and also distributed machines. And you can see for yourself their performance results; they're not far off from hand-tuned MPI.
[1]: https://github.com/nv-legate/legate.numpy
Disclaimer: I work on the library Legate uses for distributed computing, but otherwise have no connection.
- Legate NumPy: An Aspiring Drop-In Replacement for NumPy at Scale
cudf
-
A Polars exploration into Kedro
The interesting thing about Polars is that it does not try to be a drop-in replacement to pandas, like Dask, cuDF, or Modin, and instead has its own expressive API. Despite being a young project, it quickly got popular thanks to its easy installation process and its “lightning fast” performance.
-
Why we dropped Docker for Python environments
Perhaps the largest for package size is the NVIDIA developed rapids toolkit https://rapids.ai/ . Even still adding things like pandas and some geospatial tools, you rapidly end up with an image well over a gigabyte, despite following cutting edge best practice with docker and python.
-
Introducing TeaScript C++ Library
Yes sure, that is how OpenMP does; but on the other side: you seem to already do some basic type inference, and building an AST, no? Then you know as well the size and type of your vectors, and can execute actions in parallel if there is enough data to be worth parallelizing. Is there anyone who don't want their code to execute faster if it is possible? Those that do work in big data domain do use threads and vectorized instructions without user having to type in any directive; just import different library. Example, numpy or numpy with cuda backend, or similar GPU accelerated libraries like cudf.
-
[D] Can we use Ray for distributed training on vertex ai ? Can someone provide me examples for the same ? Also which dataframe libraries you guys used for training machine learning models on huge datasets (100 gb+) (because pandas can't handle huge data).
Not the answer about Ray: you could use rapids.ai. I'm using it for for dataframe manipulation on GPU
-
Story of my life
To put Data Analytics on GPU Steroids, Try RAPIDS cudf https://rapids.ai/
-
Artificial Intelligence in Python
You can scope out https://rapids.ai/. Nvidia's AI toolkits. They have some handy notebooks to poke at to get you started.
-
[D] [R] Large-scale clustering
try https://rapids.ai/
-
[P] Looking for state of the art clustering algorithms
As a companion to the other comments, I'd like to mention that the RAPIDS library cuML provides GPU-accelerated versions of quite a few of the algorithms mentioned in this thread (HDBSCAN, UMAP, SVM, PCA, {Exact, Approximate} Nearest Neighbors, DBSCAN, KMeans, etc.).
- Integrating multiple point clouds?
- Buka | Sains Data GPU RAPIDS
What are some alternatives?
cupy - NumPy & SciPy for GPU
Numba - NumPy aware dynamic Python compiler using LLVM
CudaPy - CudaPy is a runtime library that lets Python programmers access NVIDIA's CUDA parallel computation API.
chia-plotter
CUDA.jl - CUDA programming in Julia.
wif500 - Try to find the WIF key and get a donation 200 btc
numba - NumPy aware dynamic Python compiler using LLVM
Pytorch - Tensors and Dynamic neural networks in Python with strong GPU acceleration
legate.pandas - An Aspiring Drop-In Replacement for Pandas at Scale
rmm - RAPIDS Memory Manager
grcuda - Polyglot CUDA integration for the GraalVM