chia-blockchain VS bladebit

Hello folks. I'm seeking troubleshooting advice. I also posted an issue on github.

But anyway, I think you're looking for this. https://github.com/Chia-Network/chia-blockchain/wiki/Farming-on-many-machines

Fix chia wallet make_offer short-option collision on -r (Fixes #14874) (Thanks @yyolk)

Look on this close ticket: https://github.com/Chia-Network/chia-blockchain/issues/15214

To get Chia working after this official soft fork you have to get Chia Client Chia Blockchain 1.7.0 upwards to Chia Blockchain 1.8.0

Nice, waiting official announce, but following are the commits looks like last 6 are commit after alpha 1: https://github.com/Chia-Network/bladebit/compare/master...cuda-compression

git checkout -b cuda-compression or git clone https://github.com/Chia-Network/bladebit.git -b cuda-compression

I don't have any epycs, but I've talked with many people who do, as well as some TR pro owners with 3000 and 5000 series, and we've tested a lot of things. https://github.com/Chia-Network/bladebit/discussions/228 describes some of the problems seen with epycs pretty well. We've also discussed using different nodes per socket settings, disabling some of the cores, manually using numactl and running bladebit with --no-numa and --no-cpu-affinity. So yes, I have some idea what I'm talking about, and your blanket statement that "bladebit doesn't use multithreading" is 100% incorrect.

If you get your CPU-not-maxed-out problem solved, you might want to try a RHEL based distro (for Bladebit). As of a year ago RHEL was noticably faster with Bladebit. This thread had positive things to say about Rocky (RHEL 8 clone). Apparently Arch is another good candidate.