chai VS sorbet

Let's configure tests with mocha, chai and sinon on Typescript in a few steps.

These options totally depend on your requirements. For example an empty hardhat option is a very basic project sample if you need more libraries, plugins or you use Typescript later, you have to add them manually. Like @nomiclabs/hardhat-waffle , [ethereum-waffle](https://www.npmjs.com/package/ethereum-waffle), chai , @nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers , ethers , [@openzeppelin/contracts](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openzeppelin/contracts) Because, they'll allow us to interact with Ethereum and to test our contracts.

For those of you wondering what a "Chaijs" is like I was: https://github.com/chaijs/chai

> BDD / TDD assertion framework for node.js and the browser that can be paired with any testing framework.

ES6 test setup with Mocha and Chai.

It'd be hard for me to imagine what would it be like back then to write tests if it wasn't for Enzyme. Even with Enzyme, it was noticeably harder than it is today, and I still vividly remember installing and configuring in my project Mocha, Chai, Sinon, and JSDOM, to get pretty much the same tooling that today a single library - Jest - provides out of the box, while adding numerous features on top of that.

The library offers a BDD testing style and fully exploits javascript promises - the resulting tests are simple, clear and expressive. Chakram is built on node.js, mocha, chai and request.

For this example, I am using Mocha, plus Chai for its BDD expect syntax and the chai-as-promised plugin for asynchronous matchers.

chai

Not part of the official language spec, but Ruby has Sorbet, from a company who employs Ruby core contributors and helped with the recently released JIT additions to the language, amount countless other contributions over the last couple decades.

https://sorbet.org/

First let's introduce the tool: Sorbet is a gem developed by Stripe that aims to bring type notation syntax and type checking support for the Ruby ecosystem by utilizing the "Gradual typing" philosophy, it also provide type generation from YARD comments via the tapioca gem, allowing to grow alongside the already built Ruby codebase.

We have hundreds of thousands of lines of ruby code spanning many services / monoliths. Even now I find it somewhat annoying to open a controller / component that is basically an empty class def but somehow executes a bunch of complex stuff via mixins, monkey patches etc, and you have to figure out how.

We are turning to https://sorbet.org/ to reign in the madness. I'm keen to know if others are doing the same, and how they are finding it (pros and cons)

According to https://sorbet.org/ , the vast majority of code at Stripe is written in ruby.

Caso de Stripe, que tuvo que inventar Sorbet para tener type checking en ruby.

> I guess what I'm asking is: do you see a future where there is more explicit control afforded to people who want to pick their own tradeoffs without resorting to writing everything performance-sensitive in extensions written in C/Rust/whatever?

An approach exists already in the present, and it's Stripe's Sorbet AOT compiler (https://github.com/sorbet/sorbet/tree/master/compiler).

That's incorrect. You may be thinking of Stripe, and AFAICT it's not very actively developed anymore: https://github.com/sorbet/sorbet/commits/master/compiler