chai VS supertest

Let's configure tests with mocha, chai and sinon on Typescript in a few steps.

These options totally depend on your requirements. For example an empty hardhat option is a very basic project sample if you need more libraries, plugins or you use Typescript later, you have to add them manually. Like @nomiclabs/hardhat-waffle , [ethereum-waffle](https://www.npmjs.com/package/ethereum-waffle), chai , @nomiclabs/hardhat-ethers , ethers , [@openzeppelin/contracts](https://www.npmjs.com/package/@openzeppelin/contracts) Because, they'll allow us to interact with Ethereum and to test our contracts.

For those of you wondering what a "Chaijs" is like I was: https://github.com/chaijs/chai

> BDD / TDD assertion framework for node.js and the browser that can be paired with any testing framework.

ES6 test setup with Mocha and Chai.

It'd be hard for me to imagine what would it be like back then to write tests if it wasn't for Enzyme. Even with Enzyme, it was noticeably harder than it is today, and I still vividly remember installing and configuring in my project Mocha, Chai, Sinon, and JSDOM, to get pretty much the same tooling that today a single library - Jest - provides out of the box, while adding numerous features on top of that.

The library offers a BDD testing style and fully exploits javascript promises - the resulting tests are simple, clear and expressive. Chakram is built on node.js, mocha, chai and request.

For this example, I am using Mocha, plus Chai for its BDD expect syntax and the chai-as-promised plugin for asynchronous matchers.

chai

Supertest is quite popular and easy to use test tool, you can do integration and E2E test as well, you just need to pass it the server instance or a string to make a request and assert over the response.

If the latter, there are a bunch of different options for writing automated tests. One popular way is using Jest to run your tests. If you're trying to test the backend end-to-end flow, you could use Supertest to make requests and assert on the responses.

I did something similar with a full stack Typescript project, using supertest and node-fetch. It was nice.

Unit, Integration and E2E tests using Jest and Supertest

This is why integration tests > unit tests. I really hate mocking and I never bother testing individual units that don't affect how users use my app and code. In your case, I'd just use something like supertest to test this functionality e2e.

Yes, but when every function handler is separate from the router, then you can use node-mocks-http to test each handler, to test the router is simpler to use supertest to write integration tests, for E2E tests I personally recommend [pactum](pactumjs.github.io/)

Simple booking api attempt with Typescript, Express, TypeORM and Postgres. Testing with Jest & Supertest.

In a Node.js application, writing API tests is a good start. They provide more coverage than unit testing. You can use frameworks like Supertest, Jest, or any other library that provides a high-level abstraction for testing APIs.

supertest npm package that helps test HTTP

If you want to write integration tests - https://jestjs.io - https://github.com/visionmedia/supertest