chadtree VS kok.nvim

chadtree for dealing with files in the current project & Rnvimr (which basically integrates Ranger) when I want to work with files all over the disk.

CHADTree basically NERDTree but harder faster stronger,

I don't use coc but coq_nvim so I deleted coc support. And added support for CHADtree

Do you use a file explorer in vim ? I guess it probably is something like this, this or maybe this. While all these are fancy looking with icons and stuff there is a file tree and explorer in vim already. It is not the best file-explorer honestly but it works and is faster than most of these. Yes I am talking about the good ol' netrw.

my plans for the future is to have more of a refocus on chadtree, and finally bring in batch renaming, which i've wanted to do for a long time, but was too busy with coq, and start working on the issue tracker.

Have u thought of using chadtree plugin for opening tabs? Or maybe I'm missing your point?

LOL, god I fucking love it when people say my project names :D :D :D gay, sad, chad, coq.

had a look at chadtree's and its commit history traumatised me

I think it's just "github" see bottom of page https://github.com/ms-jpq/chadtree/blob/chad/docs/THEME.md - wouldn't mind to tweak that since the blue looks odd on dark background.

You can look at my code @ chadtree here.

In the examples listed on this page https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim, there is a pattern overlay over the whole screen. Is there a neovim plugin that does this? Thanks.

nvim-cmp or coq_nvim is for autocompletion. Treesitter is for parsing language syntax. (I guess the most typical use case for this would be syntax highlighting.) Note that (neo)vim also has built in manual completion that you can use by setting up your omnifunc and triggering it with in insert mode .

Aw man that's not nice to hear. I have had my own struggle with lsp not gonna lie. I used to use coc until it got too slow, after struggling for like 2 days lol lsp is working fast and neat. I'd suggest you to take a look at coq https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim which claims to be fast as fuck (literally lol) and also claims to be faster than lsp (because its written using c or something). Haven't tried it personally

Coq_nvim

I'm attempting to use (coq_nvim)[https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim]. This is my config:

Does your coq_nvim and nvim-lspconfig really load? Because they have opts = true

I'd be happy for someone who knows more about this to correct me. But in my experience as well, nvim-cmp is not as good completion as vscode, its suggestions can be all over the place sometimes. I found that coq_nvim tends to better in this regard. I still prefer nvim-cmp for other reasons but you should definitely try coq_nvim out and see if you have a better experience.

Coq_nvim isn't the same as Coc.nvim. Coq is a completion plugin with lots of caching written in Python that works alongside the builtin LSP. Coc is an LSP client (and has it's own plugin ecosystem) written in Node.

There are some like https://github.com/SirVer/ultisnips and https://github.com/ms-jpq/coq_nvim. Speed is not really an issue, I guess people just prefer to have fewer dependencies and use lua which is already bundled in neovim.

Maybe using coq.nvim instead of nvim-cmp could help (?) dince it caches the LSP responses. I haven't test it, though