Is it a bad config or cmp isn't as smart as VSCode autocompletion?

1. nvim-config

   1 3 0 5.2 Lua

   

   This is my config (as I'm a newbie to nvim, it's mostly a compilation of suggested configs from docs): https://github.com/flppv/nvim-config/blob/master/lua/plugins/cmp.lua

2. CodeRabbit

   coderabbit.ai featured

   CodeRabbit: AI Code Reviews for Developers. Revolutionize your code reviews with AI. CodeRabbit offers PR summaries, code walkthroughs, 1-click suggestions, and AST-based analysis. Boost productivity and code quality across all major languages with each PR.

   

3. kok.nvim

   2 60 3,673 9.0 Python

   Fast as FUCK nvim completion. SQLite, concurrent scheduler, hundreds of hours of optimization.

   

   I'd be happy for someone who knows more about this to correct me. But in my experience as well, nvim-cmp is not as good completion as vscode, its suggestions can be all over the place sometimes. I found that coq_nvim tends to better in this regard. I still prefer nvim-cmp for other reasons but you should definitely try coq_nvim out and see if you have a better experience.

4. ts-redux-react-realworld-example-app

   3 6 224 0.0 TypeScript

   

   Maybe you need to tweak the tsconfig.json? I've tested tsserver in this codebase and it worked fine (for my standards). Here is the config I used.

5. nvim-starter

   4 28 256 5.2

   Neovim example configuration. To help you start in your journey

   

   Maybe you need to tweak the tsconfig.json? I've tested tsserver in this codebase and it worked fine (for my standards). Here is the config I used.

6. cmp-nvim-lsp

   5 25 1,402 4.1 Lua

   nvim-cmp source for neovim builtin LSP client

   

   Yep. Make sure you have cmp-nvim-lsp installed, as well as an LSP server running.

7. InfluxDB

   influxdata.com featured

   InfluxDB high-performance time series database. Collect, organize, and act on massive volumes of high-resolution data to power real-time intelligent systems.

   

Suggest a related project