cedro VS femtovg

I’ve built it for now in a separate branch called “self”:

    git clone -b self https://github.com/Sentido-Labs/cedro.git

Currently, it does not make any difference whether this is one token or more because it is sent to the compiler exactly the same as it came in, but you could write a macro/plugin (src/macros/] that recognized this pattern and inserted a space right before the minus “-” sign.

Hi, when I presented the first release here 8 months ago (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28166125) it got interesting comments and today I’ve made a new release with additional features:

- Break out of nested loops: break label; (https://sentido-labs.com/en/library/cedro/202106171400/#labe...)

- Notation for array slices: array[start..end] (https://sentido-labs.com/en/library/cedro/202106171400/#slic...)

- Loop macros: #foreach { ... #foreach } (https://sentido-labs.com/en/library/cedro/202106171400/#loop...)

The possibility of loop macros was discussed in this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=28166698

At the time I hadn’t figured out how to make it useful without type information, but now it works. The same for the array slice notation: it took me a while to figure out how to make it do something useful without reflection, with a purely syntantical transformation.

Loop macros are useful for the kind of things for which you would use x-macros (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Macro), with the advantage that it does not pollute the global namespace with macro names and the body of the macro stays more similar to the final result, which makes big macros easier to read.

Since it runs before the standard C preprocessor it can do things like building up `_Generic` macros as shown in the loop macro vec example: https://sentido-labs.com/en/library/cedro/202106171400/#loop...

Source code (Apache 2.0 license): https://sentido-labs.com/en/library/ or https://github.com/Sentido-Labs/cedro

If pre-processing your code is an acceptable compromise, my Cedro pre-processor has that feature: passing a file through it produces standard C code for your compiler, and it includes a wrapper cedrocc that can be used in Unix/POSIX-style systems like Linux as a drop-in replacement for GCC: https://github.com/Sentido-Labs/cedro/

What I’d like to do is a quick proof-of-concept to see whether whatever instructions are available in my CPU can be leveraged for UTF-8 en-/decoding.

For instance, does it work any better than my C implementation? https://github.com/Sentido-Labs/cedro/blob/master/src/cedro....

Maybe the compiler already compiles that to an optimal SIMD version, I don’t know.

Femtovg (https://github.com/femtovg/femtovg) which uses OpenGL to render

Congrats! I don't want to diminish the accomplishment, but have you seen femtovg? It seems like it's probably well-aligned with your needs.

I'm currently using femtovg for vector graphics in my games, and I would like to get into bevy by porting one of my game prototypes using it to bevy.

I use femtovg It's a simple vector graphics engine having all the important features you probably want from a 2D rendering engine: simple shapes, images, text

https://github.com/femtovg/femtovg/pull/5

Before Power10 was done, IBM actually asked us Raptor users about proposals for useful machine code instructions to add to it. I replied that I’d like to have hardware UTF-8 de-/encoding but they wanted a more detailed proposal and I never got around to write it. I’m not even sure that this would be worthwhile, but I see UTF-8 de-/encoding everywhere in the code I write and would like it to approach memory read/write speeds.

I was very disappointed to learn that they had gone more proprietary with Power10 so I would not have been able to use those instructions anyway. What a pity!

In my actual code, I'm using a library called femtovg that is a Rust port of a C library for 2D rendering. But In the blog post I kept the example simple to keep it relevant for people who might want to use Web Workers + WASM for other things; didn't want to get hung up on femtovg for someone who had never heard of it. As you say, if you all you need to do is basic 2D manipulations of a canvas that are supported by the native API, then you likely don't need WASM.

You guys should also check out the femtovg project, a 2D rendering API that sixty fps relies on.

https://github.com/femtovg/femtovg

It's a decent starting point for trying to build your own toolkit.

I have recently added a wgpu backend but for now it lives in my fork https://github.com/adamnemecek/femtovg

run the demo with `cargo run --example wgpu_demo --release`.

Also join the femtovg discord https://discord.gg/V69VdVu

I'm involved with the femtovg project. We are definitely looking for contributors. Join the discord channel.

It's not a GUI framework but I'm involved with this project called femtovg, it's a Rust nanovg port. I've recently added a wgpu backend. Run the demo with cargo run --example wgpu_demo --release. Some people have been using it for their own UIs, e.g. tuix. I think that you should consider rolling your own GUI toolkit, it's not that bad and you'll appreciate the control.