buddy_alloc VS crystal

If you need a sub-allocator with predictable performance feel free to give it a try. The code is here and it is licensed under the 0BSD license, making it as lax and as close to public domain as possible. Comments, issues and PRs are always welcomed and appreciated. Thanks!

I maintain a project that's not technically MISRA compliant (due to being a memory allocator and MISRA disallowing the very idea) and I keep it at 100% test coverage with support for multiple compilers and operating systems. Over time I had a few users reporting back - since it's working for them I count that as success. Is it wildly popular ? Of course not, but it doesn't have to be.

You are right about the tests - they are written with 64-bit in mind. I ought to rework them to switch sizes based on arch but that will take a weekend. I've filed https://github.com/spaskalev/buddy_alloc/issues/19 to track this.

I also maintain a application-based malloc (that doesn't do obtaining and releasing memory through the OS, just managing sub-diving a larger memory block into smaller requests) at https://github.com/spaskalev/buddy_alloc - feel free to ping me with any questions about it.

I'm the author of https://github.com/spaskalev/buddy_alloc - a custom memory allocator for C (modern C11, works with C++ as well) designed for predictable and repeatable performance. It is suitable for use in embedded, games and any other system with soft or hard real-time demands. It has 100% line and branch test coverage and uses a fixed amount of space on the call stack when called. Recently the project had its first external contribution as well. Cheers!

I made a memory allocator that turned out rather neat - https://github.com/spaskalev/buddy_alloc

27. Crystal - $77,104

I like the first code example on https://crystal-lang.org

    # A very basic HTTP server

Obviously as an interpreted language, it's never going to be as fast as something like C, Rust, or Go. Traditionally the ruby maintainers have not designed or optimized for pure speed, but that is changing, and the language is definitely faster these days compared to a decade ago.

If you like the ruby syntax/language but want the speed of a compiled language, it's also worth checking out Crystal[^1]. It's mostly ruby-like in syntax, style, and developer ergonomics.[^2] Although it's an entirely different language. Also a tiny community.

[1]: https://crystal-lang.org/

Crystal is a nice language that's not only simple to read and write but performs very well too. And the documentation is amazing as well.

Ruby is a super fun scripting language. I much prefer it to python when I need something with a little more "ooomph" than bash. It's just...nice...to write in. Ruby performance has come a long way in the last decade as well. There's libraries for pretty much everything.

My modern programming toolkit is basically golang + ruby + bash and I am never left wanting.

I do find Crystal (https://crystal-lang.org/) really interesting and am hoping it has its own "ruby on rails" moment that helps the language reach a tipping point in popularity. All the beauty of ruby with all of the speed of Go (and then some, it often compares favorably to languages like rust in benchmarks).