borb VS pikepdf

Compare borb vs pikepdf and see what are their differences.

Our great sponsors
  • WorkOS - The modern identity platform for B2B SaaS
  • InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
  • SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
borb pikepdf
66 4
3,283 2,026
- 2.1%
5.2 9.5
about 1 month ago about 23 hours ago
Python Python
GNU General Public License v3.0 or later Mozilla Public License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

borb

Posts with mentions or reviews of borb. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-10-28.

pikepdf

Posts with mentions or reviews of pikepdf. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-06-17.
  • This Week in Python
    5 projects | dev.to | 17 Jun 2022
    pikepdf – A Python library for reading and writing PDF, powered by qpdf
  • Recovering redacted information from pixelated videos
    7 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 25 Jan 2022
    Not off the shelf but here are some tools. I have no experience with them.

    Wolf binarization - I think it makes the text more clear before OCR.

    https://github.com/chriswolfvision/local_adaptive_binarizati...

    This thing OCRs the pdf using Tesseract OCR

    https://github.com/ocrmypdf/OCRmyPDF/

    Two other pdf tools

    https://github.com/qpdf/qpdf

    https://github.com/pikepdf/pikepdf

  • Show HN: Pystitcher – A Declarative Alternative to Pdftk
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 30 Dec 2021
    i recently transitioned a large PDF processing pipeline[1] away from PyPDF3 to use the pikepdf[2] library instead. pikepdf is based on the C++ `qpdf` library, and this switch has cut the necessary special-case manual checking + error handling in half compared to pypdf for these sorts of tasks.

    [1]: i'm helping out with the CV Open Access archive, https://openaccess.thecvf.com/menu. broadly, our pipeline needs to ingest tons of author-provided PDFs of varying quality and output a canonical PDF with corrected page numbers, proper metadata, and a banner stamped on the first page. it's a lot of work, and it's not uncommon for pypdf to simply fail for slightly invalid input or give garbled results. this isn't optimal since we can't review 2,000 papers per conference release lol. pypdf has been nice, but pikepdf has handled everything i've thrown at it.

    [2] https://pikepdf.readthedocs.io

  • a collection of pdf-files (copy of a book ) in disorder: solfing wiht pikepdf
    1 project | /r/learnpython | 2 Jun 2021

What are some alternatives?

When comparing borb and pikepdf you can also consider the following projects:

ReportLab

fpdf2 - Simple PDF generation for Python

PyPDF2 - A pure-python PDF library capable of splitting, merging, cropping, and transforming the pages of PDF files

PyPDF2 - A utility to read and write PDFs with Python [Moved to: https://github.com/py-pdf/PyPDF2]

PDFMiner - Python PDF Parser (Not actively maintained). Check out pdfminer.six.

qpdf - QPDF: A content-preserving PDF document transformer

pdf2docx - Open source Python library for converting PDF to DOCX.

malicious-pdf - 💀 Generate a bunch of malicious pdf files with phone-home functionality. Can be used with Burp Collaborator or Interact.sh

WeasyPrint - The awesome document factory

python-anvil - Python library and CLI for the Anvil API