bitcoin-abc VS bch-zce

I found a definition of MAX_STANDARD_TX_SIZE here.

If you have old miners or just like to mine into cold storage wallets .If you don't have a core wallet then download it on the official repository https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/releases or electrum wallet https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/ElectrumABC

You mean when a BCH developer discovered a bug in BCH while testing the CTOR consensus change which redid all the double spend detection but somehow left this bug in place, and mistakenly believed it only caused a crash and reported to Bitcoin Core.

Here's a link: https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/commit/d1d091ba73f574ae5eb189fe7655c67bf5d338cf

https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc/issues/35#issuecomment-337921237

Do you mean the default value of the -minrelaytxfee command-line option? That's "hard-coded" in exactly the same way that the BCH blocksize generation limit has been "hard-coded" to 2 MB since 2017 in Bitcoin ABC. But it turns out that miners don't always use the default values for command-line options that matter to them.

But in bch, the software keeps to be improved and is hosted on Github: https://github.com/Bitcoin-ABC/bitcoin-abc these pullrequests get approved, but at some point, somebody, a breathing person! Must select the pulrequests and merge them into a new version, that gets flagged as verson xx.xx.xx . Who in bch does that. This is indeed a centralised action ( this tis the same as in btc)

Good question. Besides all the usual NFT mumbo jumbo, there are interesting things you can do with smart contracts in the context of everyday money, such as zero-conf escrows.

More; https://github.com/bitjson/bch-zce/issues/19 and https://bitcoincashresearch.org/t/chip-2021-08-zces-zero-confirmation-escrows/537

As for escrows, well, I guess you're just late to the party. https://github.com/bitjson/bch-zce

Not sure the current status of the feature but here is a writeup explaining what it is: https://github.com/bitjson/bch-zce

Your other comment says "Great work" and in the parent comment your opinion is that Taproot is already obsolete. Did you read the ZCE chip and what it states about Taproot?

The question here is whether it creates value. That particular author writing about BCH still creates value. Maybe his thoughts will resonate with some people better than something like this (https://github.com/bitjson/bch-zce). It is exceptional work by an exceptional individual... but someone with an average intelligence won't understand it (I know because I don't understand it fully either :) )...