bft-json-crdt VS y-sweet

Compare bft-json-crdt vs y-sweet and see what are their differences.

bft-json-crdt

🏰 the first JSON-like Byzantine Fault Tolerant CRDT (by jackyzha0)

y-sweet

A standalone yjs server with persistence to S3 or filesystem. (by drifting-in-space)
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
bft-json-crdt y-sweet
2 2
188 339
- 7.7%
10.0 9.2
over 1 year ago 2 days ago
Rust Rust
MIT License GNU General Public License v3.0 or later
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

bft-json-crdt

Posts with mentions or reviews of bft-json-crdt. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-21.
  • Building a BFT JSON CRDT
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Nov 2022
    I'm quite surprised by the [benchmarks versus Automerge JS & Rust](https://github.com/jackyzha0/bft-json-crdt#benchmarks) when it comes to memory:

    > Ours (Basic) 27.6MB

    > Ours (BFT) 59.5MB

    > Automerge (Rust) 232.5MB

    I would expect adding the public key tracking to use more memory; I wonder how Automerge is spending so much more memory. Possibly on a bunch of internal caches or memoization that give the order-of-magnitude improvement in speed?

    > Ops: 100k

    > Ours (Basic) 9.321s

    > Ours (BFT) 38.842s

    > Automerge (Rust) 0.597s

y-sweet

Posts with mentions or reviews of y-sweet. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2023-10-04.
  • Show HN: Algora – open-source coding bounties
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Oct 2023
    Direct link to ticket: https://github.com/drifting-in-space/y-sweet/issues/78
  • An Interactive Intro to CRDTs
    3 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 4 Oct 2023
    > knowing for sure what state a user’s client is in when debugging is tough too

    My team has built an open-source debugger for Yjs that might interest you (docs: https://y-sweet.cloud/advanced/debugger)

    You mention the investor-funded services that pop up to make this stuff easier -- our goal with Y-Sweet is to build the same type of DX you’d get from those services, but build it on a fully open-source platform with Yjs at the core: https://github.com/drifting-in-space/y-sweet

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bft-json-crdt and y-sweet you can also consider the following projects:

diamond-types - The world's fastest CRDT. WIP.

trigger.dev - Trigger.dev is the open source background jobs platform for TypeScript.

overlord - Overlord consensus protocol.

partykit - PartyKit simplifies developing multiplayer applications

cr-sqlite - Convergent, Replicated SQLite. Multi-writer and CRDT support for SQLite

yjs - Shared data types for building collaborative software

AlephBFT - Rust implementation of Aleph consensus protocol

crdt-richtext - Rich text CRDT that implements Peritext and Fugue

prolly-trees - Hash consistent search trees.

rust-crdt - a collection of well-tested, serializable CRDTs for Rust