bft-json-crdt VS overlord

Compare bft-json-crdt vs overlord and see what are their differences.

bft-json-crdt

🏰 the first JSON-like Byzantine Fault Tolerant CRDT (by jackyzha0)
Bft CRDT crdt-implementations JSON json-crdt
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

overlord

Overlord consensus protocol. (by nervosnetwork)
Consensus Bft Rust Library Cargo muta
Source Code
nervosnetwork.github.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
bft-json-crdt overlord
2 1
188 78
- -
10.0 0.0
over 1 year ago 8 months ago
Rust Rust
MIT License MIT License
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

bft-json-crdt

Posts with mentions or reviews of bft-json-crdt. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-21.
  • Building a BFT JSON CRDT
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Nov 2022
    I'm quite surprised by the [benchmarks versus Automerge JS & Rust](https://github.com/jackyzha0/bft-json-crdt#benchmarks) when it comes to memory:

    > Ours (Basic) 27.6MB

    > Ours (BFT) 59.5MB

    > Automerge (Rust) 232.5MB

    I would expect adding the public key tracking to use more memory; I wonder how Automerge is spending so much more memory. Possibly on a bunch of internal caches or memoization that give the order-of-magnitude improvement in speed?

    > Ops: 100k

    > Ours (Basic) 9.321s

    > Ours (BFT) 38.842s

    > Automerge (Rust) 0.597s

overlord

Posts with mentions or reviews of overlord. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2021-11-01.
  • Muta is part of Nervos?
    3 projects | /r/NervosNetwork | 1 Nov 2021
    Muta is chain framework (e.g. substrate or cosmos-sdk) being intensively worked on in 2020. The design goal of Muta is high performance and usability. Muta can process ~3k transactions per second and achieve instant finality thanks to a BFT consensus implementation named Overlord.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bft-json-crdt and overlord you can also consider the following projects:

y-sweet - A standalone yjs server with persistence to S3 or filesystem.

paxakos - Rust implementation of Paxos consensus algorithm

diamond-types - The world's fastest CRDT. WIP.

tikv - Distributed transactional key-value database, originally created to complement TiDB

cr-sqlite - Convergent, Replicated SQLite. Multi-writer and CRDT support for SQLite

muta - Muta is a high-performance blockchain framework.

AlephBFT - Rust implementation of Aleph consensus protocol

cita - A high performance blockchain kernel for enterprise users.

prolly-trees - Hash consistent search trees.

bft-json-crdt vs y-sweet overlord vs paxakos bft-json-crdt vs diamond-types overlord vs tikv bft-json-crdt vs cr-sqlite overlord vs muta bft-json-crdt vs AlephBFT overlord vs cita bft-json-crdt vs prolly-trees overlord vs AlephBFT