bft-json-crdt VS AlephBFT

Compare bft-json-crdt vs AlephBFT and see what are their differences.

bft-json-crdt

🏰 the first JSON-like Byzantine Fault Tolerant CRDT (by jackyzha0)
Bft CRDT crdt-implementations JSON json-crdt
Source Code
Suggest alternative
Edit details

AlephBFT

Rust implementation of Aleph consensus protocol (by Cardinal-Cryptography)
Blockchain Consensus Asynchronous Bft
Source Code
cardinal-cryptography.github.io
Suggest alternative
Edit details
InfluxDB - Power Real-Time Data Analytics at Scale
Get real-time insights from all types of time series data with InfluxDB. Ingest, query, and analyze billions of data points in real-time with unbounded cardinality.
www.influxdata.com
featured
SaaSHub - Software Alternatives and Reviews
SaaSHub helps you find the best software and product alternatives
www.saashub.com
featured
bft-json-crdt AlephBFT
2 1
188 48
- -
10.0 8.5
over 1 year ago 6 days ago
Rust Rust
MIT License Apache License 2.0
The number of mentions indicates the total number of mentions that we've tracked plus the number of user suggested alternatives.
Stars - the number of stars that a project has on GitHub. Growth - month over month growth in stars.
Activity is a relative number indicating how actively a project is being developed. Recent commits have higher weight than older ones.
For example, an activity of 9.0 indicates that a project is amongst the top 10% of the most actively developed projects that we are tracking.

bft-json-crdt

Posts with mentions or reviews of bft-json-crdt. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-11-21.
  • Building a BFT JSON CRDT
    4 projects | news.ycombinator.com | 21 Nov 2022
    I'm quite surprised by the [benchmarks versus Automerge JS & Rust](https://github.com/jackyzha0/bft-json-crdt#benchmarks) when it comes to memory:

    > Ours (Basic) 27.6MB

    > Ours (BFT) 59.5MB

    > Automerge (Rust) 232.5MB

    I would expect adding the public key tracking to use more memory; I wonder how Automerge is spending so much more memory. Possibly on a bunch of internal caches or memoization that give the order-of-magnitude improvement in speed?

    > Ops: 100k

    > Ours (Basic) 9.321s

    > Ours (BFT) 38.842s

    > Automerge (Rust) 0.597s

AlephBFT

Posts with mentions or reviews of AlephBFT. We have used some of these posts to build our list of alternatives and similar projects. The last one was on 2022-09-23.
  • Build my custom network
    4 projects | /r/AlephZero | 23 Sep 2022
    On the other hand, AlephBFT repo here https://github.com/Cardinal-Cryptography/AlephBFT is more like a library that Aleph Node uses. Here you can find a detailed documentation about how Node uses AlephBFT here: https://cardinal-cryptography.github.io/AlephBFT/index.html

What are some alternatives?

When comparing bft-json-crdt and AlephBFT you can also consider the following projects:

y-sweet - A standalone yjs server with persistence to S3 or filesystem.

aleph-node - Node implementation for aleph blockchain built with Substrate framework

diamond-types - The world's fastest CRDT. WIP.

proof-of-history-explained - code example for article: "proof of history explained" published on medium

overlord - Overlord consensus protocol.

AlephBFT - A rust implementation of Aleph Protocol

cr-sqlite - Convergent, Replicated SQLite. Multi-writer and CRDT support for SQLite

taiga - A framework for generalized shielded state transitions

prolly-trees - Hash consistent search trees.

cita - A high performance blockchain kernel for enterprise users.

bft-json-crdt vs y-sweet AlephBFT vs aleph-node bft-json-crdt vs diamond-types AlephBFT vs proof-of-history-explained bft-json-crdt vs overlord AlephBFT vs AlephBFT bft-json-crdt vs cr-sqlite AlephBFT vs taiga bft-json-crdt vs prolly-trees AlephBFT vs cita AlephBFT vs overlord